그림체 도둑질당한 작가들이 내 그림 지키려 나선 이유 / 스브스뉴스
TLDRThe video script discusses the controversy surrounding the use of AI-generated art in webtoons, specifically addressing concerns about the Nobel AI's collection of learning data without permission and potential copyright infringement. It highlights the public's mixed reactions and the challenges in legally protecting artists' works in the face of AI advancements. The script also introduces 'Illuminarty,' a program designed to detect AI-generated images, as a potential solution for preventing misuse and infringement, emphasizing the need for proper legal frameworks and market order in the rapidly evolving AI industry.
Takeaways
- 🔍 An investigation revealed suspicions that an AI-generated drawing was used in a popular webtoon, sparking controversy.
- 🎨 The artist of the webtoon replaced the controversial painting with another piece, which still raised suspicions due to similarities with the original.
- 🤖 The AI in question, Nobel AI, has previously been criticized for collecting learning data without permission, leading to copyright concerns.
- 🌐 Public opinion is largely against the use of Nobel AI for commercial purposes due to potential copyright infringement.
- 📈 Generative AI requires vast amounts of data for training, which often includes unpermitted use of copyrighted material.
- 📝 Current copyright laws struggle to clearly define and protect against AI-generated content that may infringe on original works.
- 🚫 The use of AI in art has led to the emergence of services that sell AI-generated illustrations, raising ethical and legal questions.
- 🛠️ Tools like 'Illuminarty' are being developed to determine the likelihood of an image being AI-generated, aiming to bring order to the market.
- 🌟 The rapid application of generative AI in various industries highlights the urgent need for legal frameworks to address copyright issues.
- 📚 Discussions around AI and copyright are ongoing, with a call for swift legal measures to mitigate the transition period's impact on creators.
Q & A
What controversy has arisen regarding the use of AI in creating a popular webtoon?
-The controversy revolves around the suspicion that an AI-generated drawing was used in a paid webtoon series, leading to concerns about the authenticity of the artist's work and potential copyright infringement.
How did subscribers react to the change in the artist's usual painting style?
-Subscribers who enjoyed watching the webtoon immediately felt the difference in the expressions of eyes, shadows, and hair, which were strangely different, raising suspicions about the use of AI in creating the artwork.
What was the artist's response to the suspicions about the AI-generated painting?
-The artist replaced the suspected AI-generated cut with another painting. However, since the changed painting was similar to the original one, the suspicion of using AI-generated art increased.
What are the main concerns regarding the use of AI for webtoons and learning data?
-The main concerns are related to the ethical implications of using AI-generated art, particularly the collection and use of learning data without permission, which can infringe on the copyright of numerous artists.
How has Nobel AI been criticized in the past?
-Nobel AI has been criticized for collecting learning data without permission, leading to its generated images being criticized for copyright infringement of various artists' works.
What is the challenge in determining the ownership of data used in AI development?
-It is practically impossible to determine the owner of all the data in the collection process, which often results in someone's work being used as learning data without their permission.
What is the legal stance on using learning data without permission?
-In principle, one has to get the consent of the copyright holder. However, there are copyright exemptions for using existing works in the process of developing artificial intelligence due to the competition for AI development.
How can the misuse of generative AI lead to secondary infringement?
-The real problem lies in the production AI developed from such data. It is feared that secondary infringement will occur due to people who indiscriminately use generative AI without regard for copyright laws.
What is the role of 'Illuminarty' in the context of AI-generated art?
-Illuminarty is a program that determines whether an image is AI-generated and estimates the probability of its AI origin. It aims to help form a correct culture of technology use and reduce copyright infringement in the art industry.
How are artists and writers legally protected in the face of AI-generated content?
-It is challenging to claim copyright infringement in the case of image AI, as it is often seen as an idea area rather than an area of expression. However, if the final product is too similar to an existing work, it could be considered copyright infringement.
What is the current situation of AI-generated art in the market?
-People have started to make money using AI-generated art, with some selling such illustrations on talent donation platforms. However, there is no proper way to recognize or regulate the use of AI-generated images that mimic particular artists' styles.
What is the call to action for addressing the issues surrounding generative AI and copyright?
-There is a call for more rapid discussion of relevant laws and the development of devices to reduce reckless copyright infringement, thereby supporting authors during the transition period as generative AI becomes more prevalent in industries.
Outlines
🖌️ AI in Art: Controversies and Copyright Concerns
This paragraph discusses the recent controversy surrounding the use of AI-generated art in popular webtoons. The artist replaced a composition under suspicion of resembling an image created by Nobel AI, a platform criticized for collecting learning data without permission and infringing on copyright. The paragraph delves into the broader issue of generative AI and its need for large data sets, often collected without consent, leading to potential copyright violations. It also highlights the challenges in legally protecting artists' works in the face of AI technology and the development of tools like 'Illuminarty' to identify AI-generated images, emphasizing the need for a culture of ethical AI use and stronger laws to protect artists' rights during the transition period.
🌐 Navigating the AI Art Market: Solutions and Hopes for the Future
The second paragraph focuses on the rapid application of generative AI in various industries and the challenges it poses for artists and the market. It discusses the initiative of developing 'Illuminarty,' a program aimed at indicating the probability of an image being AI-generated, as a step towards forming a correct culture of technology use. The paragraph emphasizes the importance of discussing relevant laws and developing devices to reduce copyright infringement, thereby supporting authors during the adaptation to AI advancements. It ends with a call to watch recommended videos for further insight and an invitation to subscribe for more content.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI-generated art
💡Copyright infringement
💡Learning data
💡Webtoon
💡Nobel AI
💡Artificial intelligence development
💡Moral concerns
💡Generative AI
💡Copyright exemptions
💡Secondary infringement
💡Illuminarty
💡Transition period
Highlights
A popular webtoon series has sparked controversy due to suspicions of using an AI-generated drawing.
The artist replaced the suspected AI-generated cut with another painting, which only increased suspicions due to its similarity to the original.
The use of AI in webtoons has led to a public debate focusing on the keyword 'learning data'.
Nobel AI has faced criticism for collecting learning data without permission, leading to copyright infringement concerns.
There is a growing concern over the indiscriminate use of generative AI leading to secondary copyright infringements.
The development of AI technology requires large amounts of data, often collected automatically, making it challenging to determine the ownership of the data.
In the context of AI, there is a legal grey area regarding the use of existing works without explicit consent due to the competition for AI development.
AI-generated images are often seen as falling into the idea domain rather than expression, complicating copyright infringement claims.
Some artists and writers are taking measures to protect their works from AI misuse, such as posting warnings on social media.
Illuminarty, a program to determine the AI-generated nature of images, is being developed to help establish a correct use of technology and market order.
The application of generative AI in industries is rapidly increasing, prompting discussions about the need for legal frameworks to address copyright issues.
There is a call for the development of systems that can reduce the number of copyright infringements during the transition period of AI integration.
AI-generated art is already being sold on platforms like fanboxes or Paytrion, raising questions about the proper attribution and value of such works.
The community is actively discussing ways to teach AI specific artists' styles and share learning experiences, indicating a growing trend of AI in art creation.
The case of the webtoon artist highlights the need for artists to protect their intellectual property in the face of AI advancements.
The debate around AI and copyright reflects the broader challenge of balancing technological innovation with ethical considerations and legal frameworks.
The situation underscores the importance of developing legal protections for creators in the digital age, as AI continues to blur the lines between original creation and imitation.