SDXL1.0 Juggernaut XL & RealVisXL
TLDRIn this video, the presenter compares two photorealistic models, Realviz XL and Juggernaut XL, using various prompts and aspect ratios. The comparison highlights the strengths of each model, such as skin texture, lighting, and detail rendering. The presenter's personal preference leans towards Juggernaut for its cinematic qualities and maturity, but acknowledges the potential of Realviz. The video concludes with an invitation for viewers to share their preferences and suggestions for future model comparisons.
Takeaways
- π The video compares two photorealistic SDXL models: Realviz XL and Juggernaut XL.
- π Juggernaut XL was updated to version three recently, on September 5th.
- π Both models were tested using a 1024x1024 aspect ratio with 30 steps, a CFG of 6, DPM plus plus SDE, and Keras with random seeds.
- π¨ The prompts used were simple, aiming for a cinematic, film still, analog look, with high quality and no intricate details.
- π In the first comparison, the speaker leans towards Juggernaut for its slightly smoother skin texture and hyper-realistic look.
- π For the sunset lighting comparison, Juggernaut's softer lighting was preferred, despite the random seeds.
- π₯ The cinematic shot comparison showed Realviz to be brighter, while Juggernaut had a darker, dramatic tone, which can be seen as more cinematic.
- π In the car photo comparison, Realviz was favored for richer color and a better sense of motion.
- π€ The sci-fi comparison revealed that Juggernaut captured the rusted texture and dirt better, as per the prompt.
- πΊ For the simple, realistic beer glasses comparison, both models performed well, but Juggernaut's deeper contrast in black was slightly more appealing.
- π₯ Juggernaut is considered slightly more mature due to being on version three, while Realviz shows amazing potential in its first version.
Q & A
What are the two photorealistic models being compared in the transcript?
-The two photorealistic models being compared are Realviz XL and Juggernaut XL.
What aspect ratios were used for the comparison?
-The aspect ratios used for the comparison were 1024 by 1024.
How many steps were used with the CFG of 6 DPM plus plus SDE Keras in the comparison?
-30 steps were used with the CFG of 6 DPM plus plus SDE Keras in the comparison.
What was the purpose of adding 'cinematic, film still analog' to all the prompts?
-The purpose of adding 'cinematic, film still analog' to all the prompts was to enhance that specific type of look in the generated images.
What did the speaker notice about the skin texture in the images produced by Juggernaut XL?
-The speaker noticed that the skin texture in the images produced by Juggernaut XL was a tad smooth and had a hyper-realistic look.
Which model did the speaker find to be more responsive to the prompts, and how was this observed?
-The speaker found Realviz XL to be more responsive to the prompts, as observed when the purple color in the hair, which was included in the prompt, appeared in the generated image.
What was the speaker's final verdict for the first set of images comparing Juggernaut and Realviz?
-The speaker's final verdict for the first set of images was a slight preference for Juggernaut, but noted that both models were very comparable.
What type of shot did the speaker attempt to create with the models, and what was the result?
-The speaker attempted to create a more cinematic type of shot with the models. The result was that Realviz appeared brighter, while Juggernaut had a darker, dramatic tone, which was consistent across all testing.
In the car photos comparison, which model did the speaker prefer and why?
-The speaker preferred Realviz in the car photos comparison because of the richer color, better sense of motion, and interesting reflections on the wet streets.
What was the speaker's observation about the rusted texture in the sci-fi images?
-The speaker observed that Juggernaut XL better captured the rusted texture mentioned in the prompt, making the image more aligned with the desired outcome.
What did the speaker conclude about the potential of both models after the comparison?
-The speaker concluded that while Juggernaut XL is slightly more mature due to being on version three, Realviz XL shows amazing potential despite being on version one.
Outlines
πΌοΈ Photorealistic Model Comparison: Realviz XL vs Juggernaut XL
This paragraph discusses a head-to-head comparison of two photorealistic models, Realviz XL and Juggernaut XL. The comparison is based on their ability to produce high-quality, photorealistic images. The author uses specific settings such as aspect ratios of 1024 by 1024, 30 steps with a CFG of 6 DPM plus plus SDE, and Keras with random seeds. The prompts used in the comparison are simple but aimed at achieving a cinematic, film still, analog look. The author notes the strengths and weaknesses of each model in rendering skin texture, hair, and other details, and provides a personal preference for Juggernaut XL, while acknowledging the potential of Realviz XL.
π Car Photo Comparison and Final Thoughts
In this paragraph, the author continues the comparison by focusing on car photos and a sci-fi, cinematic theme. Realviz XL is praised for its richer color and sense of motion, while Juggernaut XL is noted for its softer sunset lighting. The author expresses satisfaction with both models but gives a slight edge to Realviz XL for the car photos. In the sci-fi comparison, both models showcase impressive details, but Juggernaut XL better captures the rusted texture as per the prompt. The paragraph concludes with a simple but realistic comparison of two glasses of beer, where the author finds minor differences in the foam and light refraction between the models. The author expresses no clear preference, suggesting that either model could be a good choice.
Mindmap
Keywords
π‘photorealistic
π‘aspect ratios
π‘CFG
π‘Keras
π‘prompts
π‘skin texture
π‘sunset lighting
π‘cinematic
π‘car photos
π‘sci-fi
π‘realism
Highlights
Comparison of two photorealistic models: Realviz XL and Juggernaut XL.
Juggernaut XL was updated to version three recently on September 5th.
Both models were tested at 1024x1024 aspect ratios with 30 steps, CFG 6 DPM plus plus SDE, and Keras.
The seeds for the models were left random to observe the natural variance in image generation.
The prompt used for both models included terms like 'cinematic, film still, analog' to enhance the visual style.
The first set of images showed comparable results between the two models, with a slight preference towards Juggernaut for its skin texture.
In the half-body shots, both models performed well, but Juggernaut's softer sunset lighting was noted.
Juggernaut was awarded half a point for the first round due to its slightly better adherence to the prompt.
Realviz appeared brighter in cinematic shots, while Juggernaut had a darker, dramatic tone.
The likeness of Chris Evans was more accurately captured by Juggernaut XL.
In car photos, Realviz had richer colors and a better sense of motion.
Both models excelled in car style rendering, but Realviz got a slight edge for overall believability.
For the sci-fi biomechanical cyberpunk theme, both models showed great details, but Juggernaut's rusted texture was more in line with the prompt.
Juggernaut's version three maturity was noted, but Realviz XL's potential was also recognized.
Juggernaut has a companion model, Laura, which could enhance its performance.
The final round featured a simple but realistic prompt of two glasses of beer with foam, with both models performing well.
The video creator is open to further model comparisons and invites suggestions from the audience.