The TRUTH About Selling A.I. Art...

8 Oct 202312:42

TLDRThe video discusses the rise of AI-generated artwork and its profitability, with examples of successful sales on platforms like Etsy. It addresses the legal and ethical concerns surrounding AI art, including recent lawsuits and copyright issues. The video emphasizes that while AI art can be profitable, there are challenges in copyright protection and the potential for misuse, highlighting the ongoing debate about the role of AI in the creative process.


  • ๐Ÿ’ก AI-generated artwork has seen a significant rise in popularity and sales across the internet.
  • ๐Ÿ’ฐ It is possible to generate substantial income from selling AI art, with some artists earning up to $40,000 a month.
  • โ“ There is ongoing controversy surrounding the ethics and legality of selling AI-generated artwork, with concerns about copyright infringement and the impact on human artists.
  • ๐Ÿ“ˆ Successful examples of AI art sales include digital downloads and unique styles created by generative AI algorithms, achieving high sales numbers and monthly incomes.
  • ๐Ÿšซ Current copyright law does not extend to AI-generated media, as it requires human involvement for protection.
  • ๐Ÿ“ Copyright registration can provide basic protection for works, allowing legal action for actual damages or, with pre-registration, statutory damages in case of infringement.
  • ๐Ÿ›‘ The risk of selling AI art lies in the inability to directly protect it under copyright law, which may lead to duplication and unauthorized reproductions.
  • ๐Ÿ“› The first class action lawsuit against major AI companies highlights the legal complexities of AI-generated content and its implications on copyright.
  • ๐Ÿค– Ethical considerations include the potential loss of individuality in art and the debate over whether AI can authentically contribute to the creative process.
  • ๐ŸŒ The debate on selling AI art encompasses both legal and ethical dimensions, questioning the role of AI in the art world and its impact on artists and the market.

Q & A

  • What is the main topic of the video?

    -The main topic of the video is the controversy and profitability surrounding AI-generated artwork, including legal and ethical considerations.

  • How much profit can one make by selling AI-generated images monthly as mentioned in the video?

    -The video mentions that it is possible to make between $10 to $40,000 a month by selling AI-generated images.

  • What are the concerns regarding the legality of selling AI-generated artwork?

    -The concerns include recent class action lawsuits, copyright news, and the debate over whether it should be illegal or unethical to sell AI-generated artwork.

  • How does the video demonstrate the profitability of AI art?

    -The video provides examples of shops on Etsy that have made significant sales and profits by selling AI-generated artwork, with one shop making around ยฃ55,000 per month.

  • What is the current legal status of AI-generated media under copyright law according to a US judge's ruling mentioned in the video?

    -The ruling states that AI-generated media does not receive the same copyright protection as human-created works, as it lacks human involvement.

  • What are the potential risks of selling AI-generated artwork based on the video's discussion?

    -The risks include the inability to directly protect AI art with copyright law and the potential for others to copy and sell the designs without legal repercussions.

  • What is the significance of copyright registration in protecting creative works?

    -Copyright registration provides legal protection and allows creators to sue for actual damages or statutory damages in case of infringement, potentially resulting in significant financial compensation.

  • What is the class action lawsuit mentioned in the video about?

    -The lawsuit is against three major AI companies, alleging that they violated copyrights by using the artists' images to train their AI models without permission.

  • What are some of the ethical concerns raised by the artist Carla Ortez regarding AI-generated art?

    -Carla Ortez argues that AI is not truly inspired like humans, promotes theft, forgery, and plagiarism, and threatens individuality and authentic creative expression.

  • How does the video suggest artists should view AI in relation to their work?

    -The video suggests that instead of seeing AI as a threat, artists can collaborate with AI to explore new creative possibilities and contribute to the evolving medium of AI-generated art.

  • What does the video conclude about the use of AI art for profit?

    -The video concludes that selling AI art is profitable, but it also encourages viewers to consider the ethical implications and engage in a broader discussion about the role of AI in the art world.



๐ŸŽจ The Rise of AI Art and Its Controversies

This paragraph discusses the recent surge in AI-generated artwork and the้šไน‹่€Œๆฅ็š„ไบ‰่ฎฎ. It highlights the potential earnings from selling AI art, as claimed in some videos, and the various perspectives on the matter. Some view selling AI art as controversial due to recent class action lawsuits and copyright news, considering it illegal, unethical, or ineffective. The speaker aims to address these legal and ethical concerns and determine the viability of profiting from AI art. The paragraph sets the stage for an exploration of the legitimacy and profitability of AI-generated art markets.


๐Ÿ” Legal and Ethical Considerations of AI Art

The second paragraph delves into the legal and ethical aspects of selling AI-generated art. It explains the current state of copyright law in relation to AI, noting that AI-generated media does not receive the same protection due to the lack of human involvement in its creation. The speaker outlines the basics of copyright registration and its benefits, such as the ability to sue for actual damages or statutory damages. The paragraph also discusses the practical implications of copyright on platforms like Etsy, where AI art is sold. It touches on the first class action lawsuit against major AI companies and the complexities it presents, emphasizing that there are no current laws prohibiting the sale of AI art.


๐Ÿค– AI's Role in the Art World: Inspiration vs. Creation

The final paragraph addresses the ethical concerns surrounding AI's role in the art world, focusing on the differences between human and AI inspiration. It presents arguments from an artist involved in a lawsuit against AI companies, who argues that AI lacks the ability to authentically contribute to the creative process due to its reliance on existing data and inability to bring unique insights or experiences. The speaker counters this view by suggesting that AI can be seen as a tool for collaboration, allowing artists to explore new possibilities. The paragraph concludes by inviting the audience to share their thoughts on whether AI art should be profited from and reflects on the evolving nature of AI as a medium in the art world.



๐Ÿ’กAI-generated artwork

AI-generated artwork refers to digital creations produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence algorithms. These algorithms can mimic various art styles and produce unique pieces without direct human intervention. In the video, the profitability and ethical implications of selling such artwork are discussed, with examples of successful sales on platforms like Etsy.

๐Ÿ’กCopyright law

Copyright law is a legal framework that protects original works of authorship, including artistic creations. It grants exclusive rights to the creators, such as the right to reproduce, distribute, and display their work. The video addresses the current limitations of copyright law in protecting AI-generated media, as it traditionally requires human authorship for protection.


Profitability refers to the ability of a business or venture to generate profit, indicating its financial success and sustainability. In the context of the video, it explores whether selling AI-generated artwork can indeed yield significant income, with evidence from various online shops showing substantial monthly earnings.

๐Ÿ’กEthical concerns

Ethical concerns pertain to moral questions and issues related to what is right or wrong, fair or unfair, and just or unjust. In the video, ethical concerns about AI-generated artwork involve the potential for theft of human artists' styles and the lack of individual creativity in AI-generated pieces. It also touches on the idea of AI art being treated as public domain rather than original works.

๐Ÿ’กClass action lawsuit

A class action lawsuit is a legal action taken by a group of people who have suffered similar harm or have similar claims against one or more defendants. In the video, it is mentioned that a class action lawsuit was filed against major AI companies for allegedly using artists' images to train AI models without permission, thus infringing on their copyrights.

๐Ÿ’กGenerative AI algorithms

Generative AI algorithms are a subset of artificial intelligence designed to create new content or objects based on patterns learned from existing data. These algorithms can generate images, music, text, and more by identifying and applying rules from the data they have been trained on. In the context of the video, generative AI is used to create digital art that can be sold online.

๐Ÿ’กPublic domain

The public domain refers to creative works that are not protected by intellectual property laws such as copyright, and therefore can be freely used by the public. These works may have failed to meet copyright requirements, had their copyright expired, or been intentionally placed in the public domain by their creators. The video suggests that AI-generated art is sometimes treated similarly to public domain works because it lacks the human authorship element required for copyright protection.

๐Ÿ’กDigital downloads

Digital downloads refer to the purchase and distribution of digital content, such as images, music, or software, over the internet without the need for physical media. In the video, digital downloads are a primary method of selling AI-generated artwork, with creators offering their designs as downloadable files on platforms like Etsy.

๐Ÿ’กArtistic individuality

Artistic individuality refers to the unique creative expression and style that distinguishes one artist's work from another's. It is often valued as a reflection of the artist's personal experiences, emotions, and perspectives. The video discusses concerns that AI-generated artwork may threaten this individuality by producing pieces that mimic existing styles without adding new insights or experiences.


Plagiarism is the act of using someone else's work or ideas without giving proper credit or permission, thereby presenting them as one's own. In the context of the video, plagiarism concerns arise with AI-generated artwork, as there is potential for AI to replicate the style or appearance of human-created art, which could be seen as infringing on the original artist's intellectual property.


AI-generated artwork has seen a significant increase in production and sales across the internet.

Some individuals claim to earn substantial income, ranging from $10,000 to $40,000 a month, by selling AI-generated images.

There is ongoing controversy surrounding the legality and ethics of selling AI-generated artwork, with opinions varying widely.

A class action lawsuit has been filed against major AI companies, raising questions about copyright infringement and the use of artists' images to train AI models.

Current U.S. copyright law does not extend protection to AI-generated media, as it requires human involvement for recognition.

Despite the legal grey area, AI art is profitable, with some digital product creators seeing a 91% profit margin after fees.

Etsy, a popular online marketplace, allows and supports the sale of AI-generated artwork.

The risk of copyright infringement for AI-generated art is minimal due to the difficulty in proving the artwork's origin and the potential for legal repercussions.

AI is not an autonomous creator but a tool, and it is up to the human user to ensure ethical use and avoid plagiarism.

AI's potential for forgery and plagiarism is a concern, but it also offers opportunities for artists to collaborate and explore new creative possibilities.

The debate around AI-generated art centers on its impact on individuality and authenticity in the creative process.

Some argue that AI's reliance on existing data limits its ability to contribute unique insights or experiences to the creation process.

The discussion on AI art's legality and ethics is ongoing, with various perspectives and interpretations.

The artist Carla Ortez shares her views on the differences between human and AI 'inspiration', highlighting the importance of human creativity.

AI's capability to mimic art styles raises questions about the potential for theft and forgery, but also opens up new avenues for artistic expression.

The conversation around AI art is not just about profit but also about the preservation of artistic integrity and the value of human authorship.

The future of AI in art is uncertain, but it presents a unique opportunity to redefine the boundaries of creativity and collaboration.