Cyber Realistic Realistic AI Model In 7 Minutes – Stable Diffusion (Automatic1111)
TLDRThe video explores Cyber Realistic, a realistic style model developed by Cyberia, focusing on its versatility and photo-realistic capabilities. It highlights the model's effectiveness in processing textual inversions and producing detailed outputs with minimal prompts. The video presents various tests, including different settings and prompts, to evaluate the model's performance and quality. The results show promising outcomes, particularly with human subjects, although some areas require refinement for accuracy. The video concludes by encouraging viewers to engage with the content and access additional resources.
Takeaways
- 🌟 Cyber Realistic is a realistic style checkpoint developed by Cyberia, aiming to produce versatile photo-realistic models.
- 🔍 The checkpoint has been tested by blending various models to achieve the desired output, providing a range of sample photos that are distinct and of high quality.
- 📸 A key strength of Cyber Realistic is its ability to effectively process textual inversions and LURAs, offering accurate and detailed outputs with minimal prompts.
- 💡 The Cyber Realistic negative embedding is a recommended resource to download for optimal results with this checkpoint.
- 📈 Initial tests show that the checkpoint functions as expected, producing similar results to the example images, albeit with slight differences in posture and hue.
- 🔧 Removing the Cyber Realistic negative embedding significantly affects the quality, highlighting the importance of using this embedding for improved results.
- 🔄 Testing different settings, such as sampling steps, reveals an optimal range for achieving quality results without compromising performance.
- 🏆 Among the tested samplers, DPM 2m and DD IM provided the best outcomes, closely followed by the 2m Caris sampler.
- 🎨 The CFG scale and clip skip settings also play a crucial role in the final output, with certain values yielding better results in terms of detail and composition.
- 🖌️ The checkpoint's performance with prompts related to skin tone, ethnicity, and age is generally good, although it lacks in providing a wider range of darker skin tones.
- 🏞️ In testing objects and animals, the checkpoint shows a range of interpretations, with varying degrees of accuracy, but overall delivering interesting and quality results.
- 🌈 Landscapes produced by the checkpoint were surprisingly good, demonstrating the checkpoint's capability in rendering complex scenes with a convincing level of detail.
Q & A
What is the primary focus of the Cyber Realistic style checkpoint?
-The Cyber Realistic style checkpoint is focused on creating photo-realistic models by blending various models to achieve desired, high-quality outputs.
Who developed the Cyber Realistic style checkpoint?
-The Cyber Realistic style checkpoint was developed by Cyberia.
What types of sample photos does the checkpoint provide?
-The checkpoint provides a range of sample photos that include food items, environmental pieces, and a very good boy, showcasing the versatility of the model.
What is a key strength of the Cyber Realistic style checkpoint?
-A key strength of the Cyber Realistic style checkpoint is its ability to effectively process textual inversions and Luras, providing accurate and detailed outputs with minimal prompts.
How did the test with the generation data from an example image turn out?
-The test resulted in an image very similar to the author's example, with a slight difference in posture and hue, but the quality remained good.
What was the impact of removing the Cyber Realistic negative embedding?
-Removing the Cyber Realistic negative embedding resulted in a significant difference, with improved lighting and some error connections, making it worth using the embedding with this checkpoint.
What was the optimal sampling step found in the test?
-The optimal sampling step was found to be around 20, as there was no noticeable difference in quality beyond this step.
Which samplers provided the best results with the Cyber Realistic style checkpoint?
-The 2m Caris and DD IM Samplers provided the best results, with images that closely captured what was expected from the prompt.
What CFG scale values yielded the best results without losing detail?
-Values between 5 to 9 on the CFG scale gave the best results without any harshness or loss of detail.
How did the checkpoint perform with different skin tones and ethnicity prompts?
-The checkpoint provided nice distinctions between pale to black skin tones, and slightly darker skin tones were achieved with African or Jamaican prompts. However, the Latino prompt resulted in a tanned version rather than a distinctly different appearance.
What was observed in the test with objects and animals?
-The test with objects showed a diverse interpretation of simple objects, which may be positive or negative depending on objectives. For animals, high-quality results were obtained, but there were some accuracy issues, particularly with the scorpion.
How did the Cyber Realistic style checkpoint handle landscape images?
-The checkpoint produced good results with landscapes, such as beaches and forests, and even a supermarket interior, although not highly detailed, looked convincing at a distance.
Outlines
🌟 Introduction to Cyber Realistic Style Checkpoint
The paragraph introduces Cyber Realistic, a realistic style checkpoint developed by Cyberia. It emphasizes the versatility of the model, which is achieved by blending various models for desired outputs. The checkpoint is noted for its ability to process textual inversions and Luras effectively, providing accurate and detailed results. It also mentions the inclusion of sample photos and the necessity of downloading the Cyber Realistic negative embedding for optimal use. The paragraph outlines the plan to test the checkpoint and assess its performance in quality and accuracy.
🧪 Testing and Results of Cyber Realistic Style Checkpoint
This paragraph delves into the testing process of the Cyber Realistic style checkpoint. It begins with a test using generation data from an example image to verify the checkpoint's functionality. The results show slight differences but maintain good quality. The paragraph then explores the impact of removing the Cyber Realistic negative embedding, highlighting the significant improvement in lighting and error connections. Further tests are conducted on various settings, including sampling steps, samplers, and the CFG scale, aiming to balance performance, quality, and optimal results. The paragraph also discusses the effectiveness of the checkpoint in handling different skin tones and ethnicity prompts, noting some limitations but overall satisfactory results. The testing concludes with a trial on age prompts, which yield clear and distinct outcomes.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Cyber Realistic
💡Checkpoint
💡Textual Inversions
💡Photo-Realistic Model
💡Negative Embedding
💡Sampling Steps
💡Samplers
💡CFG Scale
💡Clip Skip
💡Skin Tone
💡Ethnicity Prompts
Highlights
Cyber Realistic is a realistic style checkpoint developed by Cyberia, aiming to provide versatile photo-realistic models.
The checkpoint was tested by blending various models to achieve the desired output, showcasing its adaptability.
Sample photos provided by the checkpoint are distinct and cover a range of subjects, including food items, environmental pieces, and a very good boy.
A key strength of Cyber Realistic is its ability to effectively process textual inversions and Luras, providing accurate and detailed outputs.
Minimal prompts are required to achieve good results with the Cyber Realistic checkpoint.
The Cyber Realistic negative embedding is a suggested resource for download to enhance the checkpoint's performance.
The first test involved copying generation data from an example image, resulting in a very similar output with only slight differences.
Removing the Cyber Realistic negative embedding significantly affected the quality, demonstrating its importance for optimal results.
Testing different settings revealed that a sampling step of around 20 provides the optimal balance between performance and quality.
Among the tested samplers, DPM 2m and DD IM provided the best results, closely followed by Ula a.
The CFG scale test showed that values between 5 to 9 offer the best results without losing detail or introducing harshness.
A clip skip of one was found to yield the best overall results for this model.
The skin tone prompts provided a range of distinctions, with the prompt struggling slightly with darker skin tones.
Ethnicity prompts resulted in slightly darker skin tones, but did not significantly alter the appearance.
Age prompts were effective, offering clear distinctions in appearance based on the specified age.
Style prompts did not result in unique styling, as the checkpoint is geared towards photographic and realistic styles.
Testing objects revealed a diverse interpretation of simple objects, which could be seen as either positive or negative depending on objectives.
Animal testing produced high-quality results, although there were some inaccuracies in anatomy.
Landscapes tested well, with the beach and forest looking great and the supermarket interior convincing at a distance.
In summary, the Cyber Realistic checkpoint produces good results, particularly with people, but may lack accuracy in other areas.