UNstable Diffusion and their crimes - Art theft | Copyright violation | Lies

Vixen with Scissors
17 Dec 202206:17

TLDRThe video script discusses the controversial topic of AI-generated art, specifically focusing on 'Unstable Diffusion' and its potential legal and ethical issues. The speaker, an artist, argues that AI-generated art is essentially theft, as it uses pieces of other artists' works without permission. They express concern about the infringement of artists' legal rights and the potential misuse of personal data. The video encourages viewers to value original human creativity over the imitation offered by AI-generated art.

Takeaways

  • 🎨 AI-generated art is a controversial topic, with some viewing it as theft of artists' work.
  • 🖌️ The speaker identifies as an artist and believes that AI art lacks the authenticity of traditional art.
  • 🚀 Technological advances are supported, but the speaker emphasizes the importance of ethical data training for AI models.
  • 📝 AI-generated art can infringe on legal rights if the models are not trained on ethical data sets.
  • 🌐 The speaker mentions 'Unstable Diffusion' as a primary concern in the realm of AI-generated art.
  • 💡 The use of AI for inspirational purposes is acknowledged, but not as a replacement for original art.
  • 🖼️ AI-generated art ownership is a complex issue, with some platforms retaining rights over user creations.
  • 📸 Data security and privacy are highlighted as potential risks when using AI art generation services.
  • 🌐 The internet's speed presents challenges for maintaining control over one's digital content.
  • 👥 The impact of AI on various industries, including marketing, is mentioned with cautionary tales.
  • 🤖 The conclusion drawn is that AI art lacks the soul of human-created art and respecting original work is paramount.

Q & A

  • What is the main issue the speaker has with AI-generated art?

    -The speaker argues that AI-generated art is essentially theft, as it uses pieces of other artists' work without originality.

  • What does the speaker suggest is the proper term for AI-generated images?

    -The speaker suggests that these should not be called 'art', implying they are merely imitations or copies.

  • How does the speaker feel about technological advances in general?

    -The speaker is supportive of technological advances and integrating them into daily life and art processes, provided they are used ethically.

  • What is the speaker's stance on using AI-generated art for inspiration?

    -The speaker has tried using AI-generated art as an inspirational tool and is open to using it for that purpose, but not as a substitute for original art.

  • What is the main concern regarding the use of AI-generated art platforms?

    -The main concern is that these platforms may infringe on artists' legal rights and privacy, as well as potentially misuse the data provided by users.

  • How does the speaker describe the current situation for artists with AI-generated art?

    -The speaker views artists as victims, both legally and personally, as they are fighting to retain their rights to their own artwork in the face of AI-generated imitations.

  • What is the significance of the AI logo that the speaker mentions?

    -The AI logo signifies that the piece of art is AI-generated, and the speaker's experience suggests that it should not be removed to avoid misleading people about the origin of the artwork.

  • What is the potential risk that Jurgen Smithfield highlights about AI-generated art technologies?

    -Jurgen Smithfield highlights the risk of these technologies getting out of hand very quickly, especially in the context of data security and privacy.

  • What is the speaker's view on the value of creating pretty images versus respecting others' work?

    -The speaker emphasizes the importance of respecting others' work over creating pretty images, suggesting that ethical considerations should take precedence.

  • What was the outcome of the speaker's experiment with The Time Machine from their Heritage?

    -The results were nice but questionable at certain points, and the speaker clarifies that they did not use it as art, only as an inspirational tool.

  • What is the speaker's warning about the ownership of AI-generated art?

    -The speaker warns that with some AI-generated art platforms, users do not actually own the art they create, raising concerns about the control and ownership of one's own image and data.

Outlines

00:00

🎨 The Controversy of AI-Generated Art

This paragraph discusses the debate surrounding AI-generated art, particularly focusing on the use of stable diffusion models. The speaker, an artist themselves, expresses strong opposition to these models as they believe it constitutes theft of artists' work. They argue that AI art is not truly art, as it is created by using pieces of existing artworks. The speaker acknowledges the value of technological advances but emphasizes the importance of ethical data sets for training AI models. They share their personal experience with The Time Machine, an AI tool that generates art, and clarify that while they used it for inspiration, they do not consider the output as art. The speaker also raises concerns about the legal rights of artists and the potential misuse of personal data, specifically mentioning Lanza, an app that uses stable diffusion for AI-generated art.

05:01

🤖 AI and the Imitation of Life and Art

In this paragraph, the speaker reflects on the broader implications of AI, particularly in the context of art and life imitation. They express their view that AI, including AI-generated art, lacks the soul of human creation. The speaker mentions instances where AI has been used for purposes such as marketing campaigns on LinkedIn, with mixed results. The paragraph concludes with a call to the audience to consider what is truly important in life, questioning whether it is the creation of pretty images or the respect for others' work. The speaker leaves the audience with this thought and looks forward to their next discussion.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡UNstable Diffusion

UNstable Diffusion refers to a type of AI model that generates images from text descriptions. In the context of the video, it is portrayed negatively as it is associated with art theft and copyright violation. The speaker argues that this model, when not trained on ethical data sets, essentially steals from artists' works and lacks the originality and creativity inherent in true art.

💡Art theft

Art theft in this video context refers to the unauthorized use of artists' works by AI models like UNstable Diffusion to create new images. The speaker emphasizes that such AI-generated art is not original but rather a form of theft, as it takes existing art pieces and repurposes them without permission, infringing on the artists' legal rights.

💡Copyright violation

Copyright violation is the act of using someone else's creative work without their permission and in a way that infringes on their legal rights. In the video, the speaker argues that AI-generated art models like UNstable Diffusion often violate copyright laws by using artists' works without consent, thus disrespecting the artists' ownership and intellectual property rights.

💡AI-generated Arts

AI-generated Arts are works of visual art created with the help of artificial intelligence, based on text inputs or other data. The video discusses the controversy surrounding this practice, with the speaker asserting that while AI can be a tool for inspiration, it should not be mistaken for original art when it involves using existing artworks without permission.

💡Victor Frankenstein

In the video, Dr. Victor Frankenstein is used metaphorically to compare the creators of AI art models to the fictional character known for creating life (Frankenstein's monster) in a lab. The analogy suggests that these AI developers are 'playing God' by attempting to create something that mimics true art, but ultimately lacks the soul and originality of human-created art.

💡Digital grave robber

The term 'digital grave robber' is used in the video to describe those who use AI to generate images that steal from artists' works, likening it to the act of robbing a grave. It implies that this practice is unethical and disrespectful, as it takes from artists without giving credit or compensation.

💡Ethical data set

An ethical data set, in the context of AI training, refers to a collection of data that is gathered and used in a way that respects copyright laws, privacy, and other ethical considerations. The speaker argues that if AI models like UNstable Diffusion were trained on such ethical data sets, they could be used for inspiration without infringing on artists' rights.

💡The Time Machine

The Time Machine is mentioned as an application that uses AI to generate images based on heritage or user input. The speaker shares their experience with it, noting that while it can produce interesting results, it should not be considered as a replacement for original art and should always display the AI logo to indicate its AI-generated nature.

💡Data security

Data security refers to the measures taken to protect digital information from unauthorized access, theft, or damage. In the video, the speaker raises concerns about the potential risks to data security when using AI art applications, suggesting that personal data, such as images of one's face, could be quickly sold to companies without the user's consent.

💡Lanzar

Lanzar is mentioned as an example of an app that uses UNstable Diffusion for AI-generated art. The speaker criticizes the claim that the app deletes every picture in 24 hours, questioning the reliability of such a statement given the speed at which information travels on the internet. The concern is that users' images could be exploited without their knowledge or consent.

💡Imitation of life

The phrase 'imitation of life' is used in the video to discuss the nature of AI and its creations. It suggests that while AI can mimic human abilities, such as creating art, it does not truly replicate the essence, soul, and creativity of human life. The speaker argues that AI art, being an imitation, lacks the genuine value and significance of original human-made art.

Highlights

AI generated Arts are being compared to a digital grave robber, likening it to the actions of Dr. Victor Frankenstein.

The term 'Unstable Diffusion' is used to describe the controversial AI-generated art model that creates hyper-realistic images from text inputs.

The speaker, an artist themselves, strongly opposes the practice of AI-generated art, considering it a form of theft rather than genuine art creation.

AI-generated art is criticized for using pieces of other artists' work without permission, raising questions about copyright violation and ethical use.

The video discusses the commercialization of AI-generated art through various apps and websites that charge for generating personalized images.

The speaker argues that if AI-generated art models were trained on ethical datasets, they could be used for inspiration rather than imitation.

The term 'I licked it so it's mine' is used to讽刺地 criticize the lawlessness approach of some AI art models in claiming ownership over generated images.

The speaker shares their personal experience with AI-generated art, specifically using 'The Time Machine' and the mixed results it produced.

The video emphasizes the importance of acknowledging AI-generated art as such, with the insistence on keeping the AI logo visible on generated pieces.

Artists are portrayed as victims of AI-generated art, facing the struggle of retaining their legal and personal rights to their original artwork.

The potential risks of AI-generated art technologies are discussed, including the threat to data security and personal privacy.

The example of LinkedIn using AI for marketing campaigns is cited, illustrating the potential for unintended and negative outcomes.

The conclusion drawn is that AI art lacks the soul of genuine art and that the focus should be on respecting the work of others rather than creating pretty images.

The video ends with a call to action for the audience to reflect on the importance of valuing genuine art and the rights of artists.

Casual Browsing

Unstable diffusion JUST GOT BANNED! 😲

2024-04-13 15:00:00

Doomed To Be Replaced: Is AI Art Theft?

2024-04-15 07:35:00

STOP THE LIES! - A.I. made art DOES NOT STEAL art! - Addressing the evidence

2024-04-15 07:55:00

Art and AI: What is an Artist's Style Worth? StarryAI, Copyright with Kimberly Brooks

2024-03-30 04:15:00

New Chinese AI Chips and their Huge Problems

2024-03-30 11:25:00