ChatGPT vs Turnitin's AI II Follow these steps II No AI Score II No Plagiarism I My Research Support

My Research Support
12 May 202307:05

TLDRThis video from 'My Research Support' explores the effectiveness of AI detection tools like Turnitin's AI when used with text generated by ChatGPT. The host demonstrates how to reduce AI scores and plagiarism by paraphrasing with tools like Skillboard and WordTune. Despite the initial 23% similarity in the ChatGPT-generated text, rephrasing significantly lowers the AI score to zero, suggesting that with careful use of paraphrasing tools, it's possible to minimize plagiarism and AI detection, although manual attention is still essential.

Takeaways

  • 😀 The video discusses the use of AI detection tools like Turnitin's AI to evaluate text generated by ChatGPT.
  • 🔍 The video demonstrates how to check the AI score and plagiarism using Turnitin, a tool widely used by universities and journals.
  • ✍️ It is clarified that using ChatGPT to write entire research documents is not advisable; it should be used as a supportive tool in research.
  • 🤔 The video will also cover ethical considerations and the disadvantages of using ChatGPT in research in a subsequent video.
  • 📝 The script mentions the use of paraphrasing tools like Skillboard and WordTune to reduce AI score and plagiarism.
  • 👀 It is noted that paraphrasing tools may replace non-technical or irrelevant words, requiring manual attention for accuracy.
  • 📉 The video shows that even text generated by ChatGPT can have a significant similarity index in Turnitin, despite being AI-generated.
  • 📊 Turnitin's AI score report is only accessible through an instructor account, and it requires expert review for proper interpretation.
  • 📝 The script suggests that rephrasing the text can lead to a reduction in AI score, as demonstrated with different tools.
  • 📉 When using Quillboard for paraphrasing, the AI score was zero, indicating Turnitin did not detect the text as AI-generated.
  • 📉 Similarly, when using WordTune, the text had a low similarity index and a zero AI score, suggesting effective paraphrasing can reduce detection.
  • 📚 The video concludes by encouraging viewers to subscribe for more content and inviting suggestions for future topics.

Q & A

  • What is the main topic of the video?

    -The main topic of the video is comparing the effectiveness of AI detection tools, specifically ChatGPT and Turnitin's AI, in identifying AI-generated text and plagiarism.

  • What was the purpose of generating text with ChatGPT in the video?

    -The purpose of generating text with ChatGPT was to test how well AI detection tools like Turnitin can identify and score the text as AI-generated and potentially plagiarized.

  • What are the steps suggested to reduce AI score in the document?

    -The video suggests paraphrasing the text using tools like Skillboard and WordTune, and manually checking for non-technical or irrelevant words to reduce the AI score.

  • Why is it not advisable to write entire research documents using ChatGPT?

    -It is not advisable because ChatGPT should be used as a helping tool in research, not as a replacement for original research and writing. Relying solely on ChatGPT could lead to ethical issues and potential academic misconduct.

  • What is the significance of the AI score in Turnitin?

    -The AI score in Turnitin indicates the likelihood that a document is AI-generated. A higher score suggests a higher probability of AI involvement, which may require further review for academic integrity.

  • What is the difference between the AI scores of the documents generated by ChatGPT and those paraphrased using Quillboard and WordTune?

    -The document generated directly by ChatGPT had an AI score of 100%, while the documents paraphrased using Quillboard and WordTune had AI scores of 0%, indicating that the paraphrasing tools effectively reduced the AI score.

  • What is the role of manual attention when using paraphrasing tools?

    -Manual attention is important to ensure that the paraphrasing tools do not replace non-technical or irrelevant words, and to maintain the accuracy and integrity of the content.

  • Why might the similarity index shown by Turnitin not always indicate academic misconduct?

    -The similarity index might not always indicate academic misconduct because it could include common knowledge, properly cited sources, or coincidental similarities. Expert review is required to make a definitive judgment.

  • What are some other tools mentioned in the video for checking originality besides Turnitin?

    -The video mentions Originality.ai as another tool for checking originality, although Turnitin is more commonly used by universities.

  • What is the ethical consideration when using ChatGPT in research?

    -The ethical consideration is to use ChatGPT as a supplementary tool for research, ensuring that the use of AI does not compromise the originality and integrity of the research work.

  • What is the next step suggested in the video for viewers interested in learning more about using ChatGPT in research?

    -The next step suggested is to watch the upcoming video where the creator will discuss the ethical use of ChatGPT in research, its disadvantages, and provide further insights.

Outlines

00:00

😀 Introduction to AI Detection Tools and Turnitin's AI Score

The speaker begins by welcoming viewers back to the channel and introducing the topic of AI detection tools, which were discussed in a previous video. They mention generating text using Chat GPT and analyzing it with AI detection tools to determine an AI score. The speaker acknowledges the limitations of such tools and introduces Turnitin's AI detection tool, which is widely used in academic institutions. The video's aim is to generate text with Chat GPT, check it with Turnitin for AI score and plagiarism, and discuss steps to minimize these scores. The speaker also emphasizes the ethical use of Chat GPT in research and promises to discuss its disadvantages in a future video.

05:01

🔍 Testing Paraphrasing Tools and Turnitin's AI Score Effectiveness

In this paragraph, the speaker discusses the use of paraphrasing tools, specifically Skillboard and WordTune, to rephrase text generated by Chat GPT. They caution that while these tools can be helpful, they are not infallible and require manual review to avoid replacing non-technical or irrelevant words. The speaker then presents the results of testing these tools by checking the rephrased text in Turnitin for similarity percentage and AI score. They reveal that the original text generated by Chat GPT shows a 23% similarity in Turnitin, but the AI score is only accessible through an instructor account. The speaker also compares the effectiveness of the paraphrasing tools, noting that while WordTune seems to reduce the AI score more effectively, it's not always the case, and sometimes the AI score can be as low as 5% or even 0%.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡AI Detection Tools

AI Detection Tools refer to software programs designed to identify and evaluate content generated by artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT. In the context of the video, these tools are used to catch AI-generated text and assign an AI Score, which measures the likelihood that the text is machine-generated. The script mentions that while these tools are not perfect, they are essential for assessing the originality of content.

💡Turnitin's AI

Turnitin's AI is a plagiarism detection service widely used by educational institutions and publishers to check the originality of submitted work. The video script highlights Turnitin's AI as a powerful tool for detecting AI-generated content, suggesting that it is more reliable than other AI detection tools.

💡Plagiarism

Plagiarism is the act of using someone else's work or ideas without proper attribution and presenting them as one's own. The script discusses the importance of reducing plagiarism in documents, even when using AI-generated text, to maintain academic integrity.

💡AI Score

The AI Score is a metric generated by AI detection tools, including Turnitin, that indicates the likelihood a document is AI-generated. A higher AI Score suggests a higher probability of the text being produced by AI. The script demonstrates how different methods of text generation and paraphrasing can affect the AI Score.

💡Paraphrasing Tools

Paraphrasing Tools are software applications that rephrase existing text to create a new version while maintaining the original meaning. In the script, two such tools, Skillboard and WordTune, are mentioned as aids in reducing the AI Score and similarity index in documents.

💡Academic Misconduct

Academic Misconduct refers to unethical practices in academic work, such as plagiarism, cheating, and falsification of data. The video emphasizes the importance of avoiding academic misconduct by properly using AI tools and paraphrasing to ensure originality.

💡Ethical Use of AI

Ethical Use of AI pertains to the responsible application of AI technologies in research and academic work. The script suggests that while AI tools like ChatGPT can be helpful, they should be used ethically and not to replace original research.

💡Research Support

Research Support in the context of the video refers to the assistance provided by AI tools and paraphrasing software to facilitate the research process. The script presents these tools as valuable aids but also cautions against over-reliance on them for research.

💡Originality.ai

Originality.ai is another plagiarism detection tool mentioned in the script by viewers' comments. While not the focus of the video, it represents the variety of tools available for checking the originality of academic work.

💡Rephrasing

Rephrasing is the process of expressing the same idea using different words, often to avoid plagiarism or to present information in a new way. The script discusses the use of paraphrasing tools to rephrase AI-generated text and reduce its detectability by AI detection tools.

💡Expert Review

Expert Review refers to the evaluation of a document or piece of work by a knowledgeable individual or panel to assess its quality, originality, and adherence to ethical standards. The script mentions that an AI Score or similarity index alone may not indicate academic misconduct and that expert review is necessary for a comprehensive assessment.

Highlights

Introduction to the video discussing AI detection tools and their effectiveness.

Comparison between ChatGPT and Turnitin's AI detection tool, emphasizing Turnitin's popularity in universities and journals.

Demonstration of generating text with ChatGPT and checking AI score and plagiarism with Turnitin.

Explanation that AI detection tools are not always efficient and user requests for a video on Turnitin's AI tool.

Clarification that using ChatGPT to write entire research documents is not advisable.

Introduction of ethical considerations and disadvantages of using ChatGPT in research.

Use of paraphrasing tools like Skillboard and Virtual to rephrase text generated by ChatGPT.

Caution about the potential for paraphrasing tools to replace non-technical or irrelevant words.

Importance of manual attention when using paraphrasing tools to ensure accuracy.

Discussion on the sequence of words in text generated by ChatGPT and its impact on AI score reduction.

Presentation of three files: Chatbot, Quillboard, and Word Tool, each with different text versions.

Results from Turnitin showing 23% similarity for the Chatbot file, despite full text generation by ChatGPT.

Mention of Turnitin's AI score feature being exclusive to instructor accounts and not available for students.

Explanation that the AI score percentage does not necessarily indicate academic misconduct and requires expert review.

Comparison of similarity percentages and AI scores for files paraphrased by Quillboard and Word Tool.

Observation that the Quillboard paraphrased text received a 22% similarity and zero AI score.

Finding that the Word Tool paraphrased text showed a 5% similarity and also a zero AI score.

Acknowledgment that no paraphrasing tool is 100% accurate and the need for manual review.

Mention of other tools like Originality.ai and consideration for a video on this tool based on user interest.

Conclusion summarizing the video's findings and inviting viewers to subscribe for more informative content.

Casual Browsing

NEW Fuji GFX100S II - Faster & More Affordable Medium Format - Portrait Session

2024-05-22 08:10:01

Your AI Waifus Will Follow You?! - Character AI Alternative With No Filters

2024-04-14 14:00:00

101% tested method to Bypass AI detectors || Plagiarism free writing using ChatGPT | No ai detection

2024-07-11 06:20:00

Follow These 5 Steps with Kittl in 2024 to Create Amazing Designs for Print on Demand! Full Tutorial

2024-04-22 20:20:00

Create Consistent Characters for FREE!!! NO Dalle-3, NO Midjourney AI, NO Leonardo AI,

2024-03-27 20:45:00