Why AI art is now unpopular and its no surprise
TLDRThe video script discusses the decline in popularity of AI-generated art, criticizing the misconceptions about AI's role in the artistic process. It argues that AI art lacks the depth and personal touch of human-created art, and that the real value lies in the effort and creativity of the artist, not the output of a machine. The speaker also addresses the impact of AI on the art market, suggesting that it devalues human creativity and benefits corporations more than individual artists. The script calls for artists to reject the notion of talent as a fixed trait and to embrace the hard work and learning necessary for genuine artistic growth.
Takeaways
- 📉 Declining Popularity - AI-generated art and channels are losing popularity due to a shift in user interests and the emergence of new technologies.
- 🚧 Misleading Promises - The AI user base was initially attracted by false promises, but the reality is that AI does not understand or create art in the same way humans do.
- 🎨 Art's True Definition - Art is a well-defined concept with a rich history and scholarship, contrary to the belief that it's an ambiguous, subjective concept.
- 🚀 AI's Impact on Artists - AI-generated art has disrupted the art world, but genuine artists need not worry as their unique human touch and creativity cannot be replicated by machines.
- 🤖 The Fallacy of AI Talent - The idea that AI can unlock or replace human creativity and talent is a misconception; true talent comes from consistent effort and refinement.
- 💡 AI's Role in Learning - AI has little to offer in terms of genuine artistic growth and development, and traditional art education remains essential.
- 🌐 Economic Shifts in AI - The future of AI image generation may involve outsourcing to economically disadvantaged countries, affecting job markets globally.
- 🔄 The Homogenization of AI Art - AI-generated images tend to look similar, lacking the unique artistic voice and variety found in human-created art.
- 🎯 Authenticity over Tools - Artists should focus on creating authentically rather than relying on AI as a tool, which ultimately serves the machine rather than the user.
- 🏆 Ownership and Credit - AI-generated content raises questions about ownership and credit, often favoring the corporations behind the technology over the users.
- 📈 Market Value of AI Art - AI-generated images are often seen as less valuable in the market compared to works created by human artists.
Q & A
Why is AI's popularity in the art world declining?
-AI's popularity in the art world is declining because the user base was initially attracted by false promises. Many users do not understand the intricacies of art and mistakenly believe they can achieve meaningful artistic expression through AI. The lack of human touch and personal connection in AI-generated art has led to a decrease in its appeal and value compared to human-created art.
What is the main argument against the idea that AI is a new form of artistic expression?
-The main argument against AI being a new form of artistic expression is that art is a well-defined concept with a long history of scholarship, especially within the last 150 years. Claiming that art is an undefined and subjective concept is empirically false and dismisses the extensive knowledge and understanding that artists and art scholars have developed over time.
Why do AI-generated art accounts struggle to gain popularity and a loyal fan base compared to human artists?
-AI-generated art accounts struggle because they lack the human element that audiences connect with. People are more likely to support and engage with human artists who pour their heart, soul, and personal experiences into their work, rather than machines that produce art without emotional investment or creative intent.
What is the potential impact of Sora, the new text-to-video generation tool from OpenAI, on the AI image generation community?
-Sora's introduction may lead to a migration of AI image generators to video creation. However, this shift is unlikely to result in significant financial success for these creators, as social media platforms prioritize video content and the market for AI-generated videos may become oversaturated. This could also lead to a reevaluation of AI's role in the art world and potentially open up more opportunities for human artists.
How did art influencers contribute to the initial popularity of AI in the art world?
-Art influencers contributed to AI's initial popularity by not speaking out against it early on, which allowed it to gain traction. Their flip-flopping stances and emotional reactions to AI further confused the public and failed to provide clear guidance, inadvertently supporting AI's integration into the art world.
What is the speaker's stance on the idea that AI can unlock creativity?
-The speaker argues that AI does not unlock creativity but rather hinders it. They believe that creativity is a process of labor, effort, and personal growth, which AI cannot replicate. By outsourcing creativity to machines, individuals deny their own creative potential and the value of the human touch in art.
Why does the speaker claim that AI art popularized the idea that ideas matter but are worthless?
-The speaker claims that AI art popularized the idea that anyone can have great ideas, but fails to emphasize the importance of refining and laboring over these ideas. Without effort and experience, ideas remain underdeveloped and are perceived as low-value. AI art can create images from any idea, but the lack of refinement and human effort devalues the final product.
What does the speaker suggest about the future of AI-generated imagery?
-The speaker suggests a grim future for AI-generated imagery, predicting that its value will continue to decline. They foresee AI art being outsourced to economically disadvantaged countries where people will generate content for minimal pay, leading to further devaluation of AI art and a lack of opportunities for artists in more developed markets.
How does the speaker feel about the claim that AI can understand and unleash creativity and imagination?
-The speaker is highly skeptical of this claim, arguing that AI companies make baseless assertions about understanding human creativity and imagination without employing any real experts in these fields. They believe that AI's inability to truly understand or replicate human creativity is a fundamental flaw in the argument that AI can be a tool for artistic expression.
What is the speaker's view on the ownership of AI-generated art?
-The speaker questions the ownership of AI-generated art, arguing that users do not truly own the content they create with AI. They suggest that by using AI, individuals are essentially surrendering their creative rights and ownership to the corporations that develop the AI technology.
What advice does the speaker give to artists regarding AI and their own creativity?
-The speaker advises artists not to rely on AI for their creativity but to invest in their own skills and artistic growth. They encourage artists to reject the notion of 'talent' as a fixed trait and to instead focus on the process, effort, and personal development that lead to meaningful and valuable art.
Outlines
📉 Decline of AI Popularity and Misconceptions
The paragraph discusses the waning popularity of AI, particularly in the realm of AI-generated content and channels. It highlights the false promises made to the AI user base and the misunderstandings about the nature of art and artistic expression. The speaker, Sean, introduces himself and sets the stage for a discussion on why AI has become unpopular, its self-destructive trajectory, and the resilience of human artists. The paragraph also touches on the flawed assumption that exposure to art equates to understanding it, and criticizes the notion that art is an undefined concept, calling for a deeper appreciation of the scholarly and historical context of art.
🎨 The True Value of Art and AI's Impact on the Artistic Community
This paragraph delves into the misconceptions held by AI art proponents and the negative impact of AI on the artistic community. It argues against the idea that AI can be a new medium for artistic expression and criticizes the belief that art is undefined and subjective. The speaker emphasizes the importance of art scholarship and the well-defined nature of art over the past century. The paragraph also discusses the misguided focus on the end product in AI art, which neglects the essence of what makes art meaningful. It points out the lack of popularity and fan base for AI art compared to human-generated art and suggests that AI art's decline is due to the lack of understanding of the artistic process by newcomers to the field.
🚀 The Disruptive Potential of Sora and the Future of AI in Media
The speaker predicts that Sora, OpenAI's new text-to-video generation tool, will disrupt the AI image generation space. He suggests that those who jumped into AI image generation will now move to AI video, hoping to profit from the trend. However, the speaker doubts their success, as they believe that social media platforms prioritize video content and that popularity does not equate to financial success. The paragraph also discusses the shift in focus from images to video, which the speaker sees as a positive development for authentic engagement and reaching wider audiences. The speaker calls for a welcome of new contenders in the fight against AI and a return of audiences to platforms previously saturated with AI-generated images.
💡 The Role of Art Influencers in the AI Art Movement
This paragraph criticizes art influencers for their role in the popularity of AI art. The speaker accuses them of flip-flopping on their stance towards AI, which he believes has done more harm than good. He argues that influencers' indecision and emotional reactions have allowed AI art to gain popularity and have caused artists to feel insecure and fearful. The speaker praises those influencers who have consistently spoken out against AI art from the beginning, advocating for authentic creation. He also challenges the idea that ideas alone hold value, arguing that it is the labor and refinement of ideas that make them valuable.
🤖 The Misrepresentation of AI and Its Effects on Creativity
The paragraph discusses the false claims made by AI companies about their ability to understand and unleash creativity and imagination. The speaker disputes the comparison of AI to the human brain and the idea that AI can replicate human creativity. He criticizes the lack of expertise in art and creativity among AI company teams and calls out the baseless marketing claims made by these companies. The paragraph also addresses the issue of ownership in AI-generated content, questioning who truly owns the output when humans are not credited or praised for their contributions. The speaker warns against the dangers of surrendering creativity and rights to corporations through the use of AI.
🚫 The Problem with AI and the 'Tweaker' Community
The speaker discusses the issue of artists using AI-generated outputs and making minor adjustments to them, which he refers to as 'tweaking.' He criticizes this practice, arguing that it leads to homogenized and impersonal artwork, denying artists their unique voice. The speaker also addresses the misconception that AI users lack talent, refuting the idea that talent is an innate, unattainable quality. He asserts that talent is a human construct and that true creativity lies in the labor and sustained efforts put into a piece of art, which AI cannot replicate.
🌐 The Future of AI and the Art Market
The paragraph predicts a grim future for AI in the art market, suggesting that AI-generated content will be outsourced to call centers in economically disadvantaged countries. The speaker argues that this will not create opportunities for AI users but will instead exploit workers in these countries. He also discusses the decline in the popularity of AI and the crumbling of the AI art community, urging artists not to ignore the impact of AI and to take action against it. The speaker emphasizes the importance of human creativity and the value of authentic artistic expression over AI-generated content.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI popularity
💡Artistic expression
💡Authentic creation
💡AI-generated imagery
💡Corporations and AI
💡Artificial intelligence
💡Ownership
💡Art influencers
💡Talent
💡Creativity
💡AI-generated jobs
Highlights
AI's popularity is declining, with image views on the decline and a general lack of interest in AI-generated channels.
The AI user base was misled with false promises, but the truth is that AI's course is set for its own demise.
AI art users got into it for the wrong reasons, focusing solely on the end product and neglecting the essence of what art truly is.
Art is a well-defined concept, contrary to popular belief that it's an ambiguous, subjective idea.
AI art accounts don't match the popularity and loyal fan base of actual art accounts, showing a lack of genuine connection.
AI art became unpopular as it introduced inexperienced individuals into the art world without proper guidance or understanding.
The emergence of Sora, a text-to-video generation tool, will disrupt the AI image generating game and shift focus to video content.
AI-generated YouTube accounts are not performing well, emphasizing that people connect with people, not machines.
The migration of AI-generated image users to video content will lead to more authentic engagements and a return to platforms previously oversaturated with images.
Art influencers on platforms like YouTube contributed to AI's popularity by not speaking out against it sooner, leading to a mixed response within the community.
The idea that AI can bring all your ideas to life is flawed, as ideas without effort and refinement are worthless.
AI's claim to understand and unleash creativity and imagination is unsubstantiated, as no experts in those fields support this claim.
AI's popularity also spread the idea that ideas matter, but the reality is that undeveloped ideas have little value.
AI art's rise led to the spread of corporate interests and propaganda, making marketing seem like truth.
AI companies are not giving credit to users but instead to their machines, raising questions about who the true creator is.
Ownership of AI-generated content is a significant issue, as users do not own the content they create.
AI-generated imagery is becoming homogenized, denying artists their unique voice and leading to impersonal work.
The notion of 'talent' is debunked, with the argument that it's merely a collection of sustained efforts and attainable traits.
AI cannot generate jobs; instead, it will outsource content creation to economically disadvantaged countries.
AI's initial popularity was based on the misconception that it would unlock creativity, but it actually destroys the creative process.
AI art does not contribute to artistic growth or development, and learning about art should come from human-led education.