Why do AI art users hate and discriminate artists but think its okay?

The Art Mentor
2 Nov 202315:27

TLDRThe video script discusses the contentious relationship between AI art users and traditional artists. It suggests that AI users are influenced by predatory marketing campaigns that exploit insecurities, promoting a philosophy of inadequacy. The speaker, Sean, criticizes the double standard of AI users who expect respect for their creative work while showing a lack of respect for artists' originality. He also addresses the issue of digital classism, where those with access to technology feel superior. Sean advises artists to ignore those who undermine their work, arguing that these individuals often come from a place of privilege and entitlement. He emphasizes the importance of questioning the motives of AI users and encourages artists to continue pursuing their passions without engaging in unproductive debates. The summary also touches on the myth of talent, the dangers of propaganda, and the need for artists to stand up for their rights in the face of AI's growing influence in the art world.


  • πŸ“’ AI users are influenced by predatory marketing campaigns that exploit insecurities, promoting a philosophy of inadequacy.
  • πŸ€” AI users often display a double standard, expecting respect for their creative work while failing to reciprocate the same respect to artists.
  • 🚫 Overprivileged AI users may contribute to digital classism, assuming superiority based on access to technology and resources.
  • 🎨 Artists are advised to ignore those who disrespect their work, as arguing with them only reinforces negative attitudes.
  • 🧐 The idea that AI will democratize art is misguided, as art has been widely accessible for decades through platforms like YouTube.
  • πŸš€ AI enthusiasts, or 'Tech Bros,' are often short-term, hype-driven, and may not contribute positively to the art community in the long run.
  • 😣 Some AI users derive satisfaction from the struggles of artists, using it to validate their own choices and dismiss their own lack of artistic achievement.
  • πŸ‘₯ The concept of 'democratization' is often misused by those who seek to control or exploit, rather than genuinely empower others.
  • πŸ’’ AI users may exhibit envy towards artists, wishing they could achieve similar skills without the effort and dedication required.
  • 🧘 Perfectionism, often cited by AI users, is a mask for deeper insecurities and is not a realistic or healthy approach to art or technology.
  • 🌟 The unique and irreplaceable value of human creativity and the complexity of artistic expression will always surpass what AI can achieve.

Q & A

  • What is the main concern expressed by Sean about AI users in the art community?

    -Sean expresses a concern that AI users are influenced by predatory marketing strategies from AI companies, which he believes exploit individual insecurities about creativity and self-worth. He suggests that this results in a devaluation of traditional artists' skills and contributions.

  • Why does Sean believe there is a conflict between traditional artists and AI users?

    -Sean believes the conflict arises because AI users rely on technology that undermines the value and respect for human creativity and artist labor. He views this reliance as a form of discrimination against traditional artists, stemming from a broader culture of entitlement and privilege among certain tech users.

  • What does Sean suggest artists do in response to the challenges posed by AI users?

    -Sean advises artists to essentially ignore AI users who devalue their work, suggesting that these individuals were never genuine clients or supporters of the arts. He advocates for artists to focus on their own communities and not to engage in arguments that could reinforce the privileges of AI users.

  • How does Sean describe the impact of AI on the perception of artistic talent?

    -Sean criticizes the notion promoted by some AI enthusiasts that talent can be substituted or augmented significantly by AI. He challenges the belief that AI can replace the need for inherent talent or hard-earned skill, emphasizing that creativity involves deeply human elements that AI cannot replicate.

  • What is the 'dirty little secret' that Sean claims AI users don't want others to know?

    -The 'dirty little secret' according to Sean is that the promotion and use of AI in creative fields is driven by marketing strategies that exploit insecurities, leading individuals to believe they are not sufficient on their own. This approach, he argues, fuels unnecessary conflict and profits AI companies at the expense of artists.

  • What does Sean mean by 'digital classism' in the context of AI and art?

    -Sean refers to 'digital classism' as a socio-economic barrier where individuals with access to digital tools and resources, like AI software, are seen as superior or more entitled to create art. This perspective, he argues, creates a divide that unfairly disadvantages those without such access.

  • How does Sean view the argument that AI democratizes art?

    -Sean is critical of the claim that AI democratizes art, suggesting that it's a misleading and potentially harmful narrative. He compares it to historical uses of 'democratization' as a justification for oppressive actions, indicating that it can mask deeper issues of control and exclusion in the art world.

  • What potential harm does Sean foresee with the increasing reliance on AI for creating art?

    -Sean foresees a degradation of genuine artistic expression and a potential undervaluing of artists' skills and contributions. He is concerned that reliance on AI could lead to a culture where superficiality is rewarded over substance, and where true creativity is stifled.

  • How does Sean propose artists should defend their rights in the face of AI's growing influence?

    -Sean proposes that artists should actively rally and advocate for their rights, making their voices heard to governments and policy-makers about the negative impacts of AI on the creative industry. He emphasizes solidarity among artists to preserve human creativity and ethical standards in art.

  • What does Sean say about the nature of artistic talent and AI's role in it?

    -Sean asserts that the concept of innate artistic talent is a myth and criticizes the AI community for perpetuating this belief to justify using AI as a shortcut in artistic creation. He argues that artistic ability is developed through dedication and practice, not inherited or easily replaced by technology.



πŸ€” The Hidden Agenda of AI Users

The first paragraph discusses the controversy surrounding AI users and their impact on artists. It suggests that AI users are influenced by predatory marketing campaigns that exploit insecurities, promoting a philosophy of inadequacy. The speaker, Sean, has been analyzing AI users and aims to expose the 'dirty little secrets' they hide. He criticizes AI users for their double standards and lack of respect for artists' creativity. The paragraph also touches on the issue of digital classism and entitlement among AI users, advising artists to ignore those who do not value their work.


🧐 The Myth of Talent and the Role of Privilege

The second paragraph delves into the misconception of 'talent' and how it's used by AI users as an excuse for not developing their artistic skills. It challenges the idea that talent is an innate quality, asserting that it's a perception without evidence. The speaker encourages artists to recognize their own growth and not be discouraged by those who idolize technology without understanding its limits. The paragraph also addresses the 'Tekken AI Bros' who are attracted to the hype around AI and are likely to abandon it in the long term. It advises artists to stand up for their rights and not be swayed by the delusion that technology can replace human creativity.


😑 The Threat of Envy and the Attack on Artists

The third paragraph examines the underlying envy and aggression from AI users towards artists. It suggests that AI users perceive artists as a threat due to their inability to develop the same level of skill. The speaker condemns the use of 'democratization' as a cover for oppressive behavior and advises artists not to engage with those who seek attention through AI. He also discusses the issue of perfectionism among AI users and the unrealistic expectations they have of AI's capabilities. The paragraph ends with a reminder that artists should not be discouraged by the unfulfilled promises of AI.


🎨 The Resilience of True Artistry

The fourth paragraph offers a message of hope and resilience to artists who may feel disheartened by the rhetoric of AI proponents. It emphasizes that the unique qualities that make art come alive cannot be replicated by AI. The speaker encourages artists to continue their work and not be affected by the false claims made by AI users. He also mentions a video he made to counteract the negative messages spread by 'AI Bros,' promising that it will help artists feel better informed and more confident in their craft.



πŸ’‘AI art users

AI art users are individuals who utilize artificial intelligence for creating art. In the script, they are portrayed as having a negative view towards traditional artists, which is a central issue being discussed. The video suggests that these users may be influenced by predatory marketing campaigns and harbor insecurities about their own abilities, leading to a sense of superiority and discrimination against artists.


Discrimination refers to the unfair treatment of a group or individual based on certain characteristics. In the context of the video, it is used to describe how AI art users are perceived as treating artists unjustly, moving from a position of celebrating to marginalizing their work. The script argues that this stems from a misunderstanding and an overprivileged attitude.

πŸ’‘Predatory marketing

Predatory marketing is a controversial practice where businesses use aggressive tactics to exploit consumers' insecurities or desires. The video suggests that AI companies may be employing such tactics, promoting the idea that individuals are not good enough and need AI to succeed, which is a key factor in the conflict between AI users and artists.

πŸ’‘Digital classism

Digital classism is a term used in the video to describe a perceived hierarchy where those with access to digital tools and the means to use them are considered superior to those without such access. The video argues that this mindset is harmful and promotes an unfair advantage for certain groups, which is linked to the broader issue of privilege and entitlement among AI users.


Entitlement in the video refers to a sense of deserving privileges or special treatment. It is associated with AI users who believe they have a right to use AI to bypass the traditional learning process of art creation. The script criticizes this attitude, suggesting that it reflects a lack of respect for the craft and the effort artists put into their work.

πŸ’‘Democratization of art

The democratization of art is the idea that art should be accessible to everyone, not just an elite few. The video challenges this notion as a guise for exploitation, arguing that art has already been democratized through platforms like YouTube. It suggests that those who use the term 'democratization' in the context of AI may be misappropriating it to justify their actions and beliefs.


Talent, as discussed in the video, is often perceived as an innate ability or skill. However, the speaker argues that there is no empirical evidence supporting the concept of talent, and that it is a misrepresentation. Instead, the focus should be on the dedication and effort put into developing skills. The video criticizes AI users who claim a lack of talent as an excuse for not pursuing artistic development.



Perfectionism is presented in the video as an unrealistic and unattainable standard that some AI art users hold for art. It is portrayed negatively, with the suggestion that it is a mask for underlying insecurities. The video contrasts this with the idea that it is the imperfections in art that often make it more compelling and human.

πŸ’‘AI Bros

AI Bros is a term used in the video to describe a group of AI users who are overly enthusiastic about technology and dismissive of criticism. They are depicted as being quick to defend AI and its potential, often resorting to the argument that AI is still in development and will improve. The video suggests that this group is not genuinely interested in the art form but rather in the hype surrounding AI.


In the context of the video, propaganda refers to the spread of particular ideas or information to influence people's opinions, often without a balanced or accurate representation of facts. The video accuses some influential figures, like the CEO of Google, of promoting the idea that artists will be replaced by AI users, which the speaker argues is a form of propaganda that artists should recognize and not accept uncritically.


Envy is discussed in the video as a significant factor driving the behavior of some AI art users towards artists. It is suggested that this envy stems from a desire to have the skills and opportunities that artists have, coupled with an unwillingness to put in the necessary work to achieve them. The video argues that this envy is misplaced and that potential exists in many forms, not just in the field of art.


AI users are often the product of predatory marketing campaigns that exploit insecurities and promote a philosophy of inadequacy.

The conflict between AI users and artists fuels AI companies, and artists must be vigilant about underlying issues.

A double standard exists where AI users expect respect for their creativity but do not reciprocate it towards artists.

AI users may feel entitled due to their access to technology, promoting a form of digital classism.

Artists are advised to ignore overprivileged AI users who do not respect their work.

The perception that art was 'kept from' AI users is debunked, as there has never been a better time to learn and become an artist.

The idea that artists will be replaced by those using AI is questioned, urging artists to recognize propaganda.

Artists are encouraged to help broken individuals rediscover their unique creative abilities that machines cannot replicate.

The concept of 'talent' is challenged as a misrepresentation, with the reality being about commitment and skill development.

AI users who idolize technology and business are likely to be short-term enthusiasts, riding the hype train.

Artists are urged to stand up for their rights and not be swayed by those who delight in their misery or doubt.

The misuse of the term 'democratization' in the context of AI is criticized, drawing parallels to historical oppressors.

AI users who seek attention and exposure are warned that this philosophy is unfounded and may lead to personal emptiness.

Envy is identified as a core issue within the AI community, with users wishing they could develop the skills that artists have.

Artists are advised to ignore those who promote violence and discrimination, as the unfulfilled promises of AI will become evident.

The issue of perfectionism among AI users is highlighted, with a reminder that imperfections often enhance the beauty of art.

The video aims to debunk the false rhetoric spread by AI enthusiasts and empower artists against the negative narrative.