Why AI Art users will quit in 1-2 years

The Art Mentor
31 Aug 202319:50

TLDRThe video script discusses why AI art users may abandon the trend within 1-2 years, categorizing them into groups such as the blissfully ignorant, those seeking shortcuts, cheap clients, struggling artists, and opportunists. It argues that AI art lacks the depth and personal touch of human creation, suggesting that true art requires skill and passion that AI cannot replicate, and warns against the exploitation and commodification of art.

Takeaways

  • 😌 AI art users may quit within 1-2 years due to various reasons, similar to gym memberships that drop off after the initial enthusiasm fades.
  • 🤔 The 'blissfully ignorant' group might find AI art fun at first but will likely quit once they realize the exploitative nature of the practice.
  • 🎨 Those who use AI art 'just for fun' may lose interest quickly as the novelty wears off and they don't invest deeply in their ideas or art skills.
  • 💸 'Cheap clients' who seek AI art to save money on hiring artists may find their expectations unfulfilled, as AI can't replace the creativity and investment that comes with human-made art.
  • 👩‍🎨 Artists feeling threatened by AI should not give up; instead, they should recognize that AI has limitations and cannot replace the unique skills and creativity of human artists.
  • 🛠️ AI art is not a substitute for hard skills; relying on it to fill gaps in one's abilities is a flawed approach that won't lead to success in the art industry.
  • 🚧 Businesses using AI art may not see longevity in their endeavors because the technology is built on unsustainable and exploitative practices.
  • 🏆 Successful companies invest in teams of skilled artists rather than relying solely on AI, understanding that human creativity is irreplaceable.
  • 🤝 Artists should not fear AI but should continue to develop their skills and offer unique, authentic contributions to the art world.
  • 🔍 Those promoting the 'adapt or die' philosophy may not have a genuine stake in the art world and are possibly spreading misinformation or fear.
  • 🌐 The hype around AI art is likely to fade, and those jumping on the bandwagon for quick gains or attention will not find long-term success or fulfillment.

Q & A

  • What is the main reason Sean believes AI art users will quit in 1-2 years?

    -Sean believes AI art users will quit because they will eventually realize the exploitative practices involved in AI art and develop a critical consciousness against it.

  • What does Sean refer to as the 'New Year's phase of AI'?

    -The 'New Year's phase of AI' refers to the initial period of excitement and influx of new users that AI art experiences, similar to gym memberships in January, which is not sustainable in the long run.

  • According to the transcript, which group of people are described as 'blissfully ignorant' in relation to AI art?

    -The 'blissfully ignorant' group consists of casual AI art users who are initially excited about AI art without realizing the exploitative nature of the practice.

  • Why does Sean argue that people who use AI art just for fun are unlikely to sustain their interest?

    -Sean argues that the excitement of using AI art for fun is short-lived because it lacks the sustained effort and investment in learning about art or improving one's imagery, making it unsustainable.

  • What is Sean's opinion on the impact of AI art on cheap clients?

    -Sean is grateful that AI art is taking away cheap clients who do not value the work of artists and are unwilling to pay a fair price for it.

  • What does Sean suggest is a common misconception among people new to AI art?

    -A common misconception is that AI art is just for fun and not exploitative, which Sean argues is an ignorant statement that will not hold up once people become aware of the exploitative practices.

  • How does Sean view the potential of AI art to replace the need for hard skills in artists?

    -Sean believes that AI art will never be a substitute for hard skills, as it cannot replicate the unique creativity and effort that skilled artists bring to their work.

  • What does Sean predict will happen to businesses that rely heavily on AI art for commercial purposes?

    -Sean predicts that businesses relying on AI art will not last because they are built on the unsustainable premise of lawlessness and lack of investment in people and quality.

  • Why does Sean think that artists who feel threatened by AI art are giving up too soon?

    -Sean thinks these artists are giving up too soon because they are not recognizing their unique value and the fact that AI art cannot replicate the authenticity and creativity that they bring to their work.

  • What advice does Sean give to artists who are struggling with the idea that AI art might surpass their own?

    -Sean advises these artists to persist and invest in their own skills, as AI art has limitations and cannot replace the unique qualities that human artists contribute.

  • What is Sean's stance on the use of AI art for social media attention?

    -Sean is critical of using AI art for social media attention, as it is not a sustainable effort and does not lead to meaningful impact or investment in one's work.

  • What does Sean suggest is the ultimate downfall of AI art according to the script?

    -Sean suggests that the ultimate downfall of AI art is its inability to provide authenticity, fulfillment, and the fact that it is built on exploitative practices without a sustainable foundation.

Outlines

00:00

🏋️‍♂️ The Futility of Shortcuts in AI Art and Gym Memberships

Sean, from Art Mentor, addresses the commonality between AI art users and gym memberships, where both experience a surge in new members around January and a significant drop by Valentine's Day. This pattern is attributed to people joining for the wrong reasons, expecting quick results without the necessary hard work. Sean predicts that AI art users will quit within the next one to two years due to their lack of understanding of the time and effort required for success. He identifies four groups likely to quit: the blissfully ignorant, those using AI for fun without deep investment in their ideas, cheap clients seeking low-cost art solutions, and artists feeling threatened by AI. Sean emphasizes the temporary nature of excitement and the exploitative practices that often drive these trends.

05:02

🎨 The Irreplaceable Value of Human Artists Over AI

Sean continues by discussing the unique value of human artists, asserting that AI cannot replace the skills, creativity, and personal touch that artists bring to their work. He refutes the idea that AI can fill gaps in an artist's skillset, arguing that hard skills are irreplaceable and that AI is not a substitute for genuine artistic talent. Sean also touches on the fear-mongering surrounding AI and encourages artists not to feel threatened by technology. He highlights the importance of persistence and the inherent limitations of AI in producing meaningful and unique art, urging artists to continue honing their craft.

10:03

📈 The Unsustainability of AI Art in Business and Commerce

Sean critiques the use of AI art in commercial settings, arguing that businesses relying on AI-generated art lack longevity and sustainability. He points out that the success of businesses is built on the foundation of human talent and creativity, not machines. Sean warns that companies using AI art risk developing a negative reputation and losing the authenticity that comes from human-created content. He emphasizes that the hype around AI is temporary and that true value comes from investing in people and original ideas, rather than seeking shortcuts through AI.

15:04

🤔 The Misguided Pursuit of AI Art for Quick Gains

In the final paragraph, Sean addresses various groups that are unlikely to succeed with AI art due to misguided motivations. He discusses those seeking social media attention, businesses looking to cut corners, and individuals who do not appreciate the value of art. Sean stresses that genuine success and memorable products come from investing time and effort, not from chasing trends or seeking instant gratification. He concludes by questioning the necessity for artists to adapt to AI, suggesting that the focus should remain on the artist's skills and creativity.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Blissfully Ignorant

This term refers to individuals who are unaware of the full implications or realities of a situation, often due to a lack of information or understanding. In the context of the video, 'blissfully ignorant' describes AI art users who are casually using the technology without realizing the exploitative practices it may be based on. The script mentions that these users will eventually develop a critical consciousness and become aware of the exploitative nature of AI art, leading them to quit using it.

💡Critical Consciousness

Critical consciousness is the awareness of social and political issues and the ability to analyze and critique them. In the video, it is suggested that as AI art users develop a critical consciousness, they will recognize the exploitative practices associated with AI art and this realization will likely cause them to disengage from using it.

💡Exploitation

Exploitation in this context refers to the practice of treating people unfairly in order to benefit from their work at little cost. The script discusses how AI art can be seen as exploitative, with some groups profiting from the labor of others without proper compensation or recognition, which can lead to a negative stigma and eventual disengagement from those who become aware of it.

💡Dopamine Burst

A 'dopamine burst' is a colloquial term for the sudden release of the neurotransmitter dopamine, which is associated with feelings of pleasure and reward. The video script uses this term to describe the initial excitement and pleasure that some AI art users feel when they first start using the technology, which may not be sustainable in the long term as it is based on novelty rather than deeper engagement with the art.

💡Short-Term Users

Short-term users are those who engage with a product, service, or in this case, AI art, for a limited period, often due to a lack of deep investment or interest. The script suggests that users who are drawn to AI art primarily for the novelty and excitement may be short-term users who will lose interest once the initial thrill fades.

💡Cheap Clients

The term 'cheap clients' in the script refers to individuals or entities that seek to pay very low fees for artistic work, often not valuing the effort and skill involved in creating art. The speaker expresses gratitude that AI art is taking away these clients from professional artists, as they do not value or respect the work enough to pay a fair price.

💡Imposter Syndrome

Imposter syndrome is the feeling of doubting one's own skills or accomplishments, often feeling like a fraud despite evidence of success. In the context of the video, the speaker warns that artists using AI may feel unfulfilled and experience imposter syndrome, as they may feel like they are not creating genuine art and are simply relying on technology.

💡Hype

Hype refers to the aggressive promotion or publicity of a product, event, or idea, often creating an inflated sense of its importance or value. The script discusses how the hype around AI art may attract users who are not genuinely interested in art but are drawn to the trendiness of the technology.

💡Investment

In the video, 'investment' is used metaphorically to describe the dedication, effort, and resources one puts into a pursuit, such as art. The speaker argues that those who do not invest in their ideas or skills, whether through AI or traditional means, are unlikely to create something of lasting value or success.

💡Stigma

A stigma is a mark of disgrace or dishonor associated with a person or thing. The script mentions that being associated with exploitative practices can lead to a stigma, which can deter people from continuing to use AI art once they become aware of the negative connotations.

💡Authenticity

Authenticity refers to the quality of being genuine or real. The video emphasizes the importance of authenticity in art, suggesting that AI-generated art may lack the personal touch and originality that comes from human artists, leading to a lack of depth and emotional connection.

💡Rhetoric

Rhetoric is the art of effective or persuasive speaking or writing, often used to influence people's opinions. In the script, the term is used to criticize those who promote AI art without a genuine understanding or appreciation of art, suggesting that their arguments are superficial or misleading.

💡Trend

A trend refers to a general direction in which something is developing or changing. The video discusses how AI art is a current trend that may not have lasting power, and those who jump on the bandwagon for the sake of being trendy may not remain committed when the trend fades.

💡Get Rich Quick Scheme

A 'get rich quick' scheme is a plan or investment that promises high rewards with little risk and effort. The script warns against viewing AI art as a get rich quick scheme, suggesting that those who approach it with this mindset are unlikely to achieve long-term success or fulfillment.

Highlights

AI art users may quit in 1-2 years due to various reasons, similar to gym memberships that drop off after the New Year's rush.

Some AI art users are blissfully ignorant of the exploitative practices within the industry, which they may find unacceptable once they become aware.

The excitement of AI art may fade for users who realize their ideas are not as great as initially thought and lack the effort to improve.

AI art has removed the 'cheap client' problem from the art industry, as these clients do not value the work of artists.

AI art cannot replace the creativity and skill of human artists, and relying on it for shortcuts is a flawed approach.

Artists struggling with AI art should persist, as AI cannot replicate the unique qualities of human art.

AI art's inability to produce original and high-quality work can lead to feelings of unfulfillment among users.

Businesses using AI art risk developing a negative image due to the exploitative nature of the technology.

Investment in human artists is crucial for businesses to create memorable and authentic content.

AI art promoters may not have a personal stake in the technology and may be spreading misinformation.

Artists do not need to adapt to AI art to be successful; it is not a substitute for skill and creativity.

AI art's limitations will become apparent to users, leading to a realization that it cannot replace human artistry.

Users seeking social media attention through AI art may find their efforts unsustainable and unfulfilling.

AI art's prevalence on platforms like eBay and Etsy may not translate to a sustainable market for AI-generated art.

People promoting the 'adapt or die' philosophy regarding AI art may not understand the depth and value of art.

AI art's impact on the art market and its potential for creating a 'get rich quick' scheme is overrated and unrealistic.

The importance of understanding and appreciating art cannot be overstated, as it serves a greater purpose beyond mere imagery.

Casual Browsing

Why do AI art users hate and discriminate artists but think its okay?

2024-04-23 04:05:00

Why Your AI Art Isn't Selling (and never will)

2024-04-23 02:15:00

Why AI Art is Causing Outrage

2024-04-05 02:30:01

How to make AI ART for FREE in 2 Minutes - NSB Pictures

2024-04-08 18:55:01

Why Selling AI Art Is a BAD Idea in 2024 💻 (Tips for AI Etsy Shops)

2024-05-17 05:10:01