Online Animation Makers: 7 Tools You Must Know (in 2024)

The script begins with the narrator's extensive experience in online animation, spanning over a decade. They've tested various online animation tools and provide an expert, non-sponsored review. The criteria for evaluation include style, usability, and price. Style refers to the visual appeal, usability to the intuitiveness and features, and price to the value for money. The narrator emphasizes their critical perspective, shaped by their experience selling videos and creating content. They also mention their process of reviewing other reviews and scoring each tool on a scale from 1 to 10.

The review delves into Create Studio, praising its unique 3D style reminiscent of Pixar characters. The tool offers high-quality, pre-made scenes that are visually appealing but non-customizable. The usability is mixed; while the app is solid and the interface professional, the timeline's group logic is confusing. Create Studio stands out for its instant preview feature and a curated library of assets. The text-to-speech engine is criticized as subpar. Despite the tool's strengths, the narrator expresses frustration with the limited library of actions and the gating of features behind a paywall.

The script transitions to a critique of Animaker, noting its popularity but questioning its quality. The tool's style is described as clean and friendly, with smooth animations. However, the usability is criticized for its unintuitive interface and the difficulty in customizing scenes, which feels more like stringing together templates. The narrator also points out the lack of a search function and the overall shaky performance of the software. Pricing is seen as decent, but the tool's overall value is questioned due to its limitations.

Babble is introduced with a focus on its variety of styles, including 2D, 3D, and sketched, which are praised for their quality and professionalism. The usability is highlighted by features like easy voiceover generation, a responsive interface, and collaborative tools. However, the review also points out the limitations in asset searchability and the tedious process of creating from scratch. The AI video creation feature is noted as a gimmick rather than a practical tool.

Palun is discussed with a focus on its pricing structure, which is criticized for being confusing and expensive. The tool's usability is criticized for its lack of intuitive interface, especially around voiceover integration and camera movements. The character builder is praised, but it's locked behind a high-paying plan. The overall feel of the tool is described as cheap, and the narrator questions its high ratings on review platforms.

The script compares Doodle and VideoScribe, two whiteboard animation tools. Doodle is praised for its classic whiteboard style and precision in animation but criticized for its limited libraries and aggressive upselling. VideoScribe is appreciated for its browser-based version and improved animation paths, but its timeline functionality is criticized. Both tools are seen as affordable but with limitations that affect their usability and value for money.

Beyond is presented as a professional and versatile tool with a strong focus on style and usability. It offers three distinct styles, a user-friendly timeline, and a robust character creator. The tool is commended for its intuitive motion paths and text-to-speech features. However, the pricing is criticized as high, especially considering the watermark on the lowest plan and the additional fees for selling videos. Despite these drawbacks, Beyond is highly rated for its comprehensive feature set and professional output.