Unbelievable! The Easiest Way to Bypass AI Content Detection - How I Did It!

Andy Stapleton
10 Apr 202409:58

TLDRIn this video, the creator tests five AI bypass services to determine their effectiveness in fooling AI content detection tools. After submitting a genuine PhD abstract, they use services like Fasley AI, Stealth Writer, and Undetected to rewrite the content. The results show that while Turnitin struggles to detect AI-generated content, Originality and GPT-0 perform better. Fasley and Undetected are highlighted as the most successful in bypassing detection, but the creator advises against submitting AI-generated content as is, suggesting to use it as a scaffold for original work instead.

Takeaways

  • 😀 The video discusses methods to bypass AI content detection systems using various services.
  • 🔍 The author tested five different AI bypass tools to evaluate their effectiveness against AI detection software.
  • 📝 The initial test involved using a human-written PhD abstract from 2011 to establish a baseline of zero AI content.
  • 📉 Turnitin was found to be ineffective at detecting AI-generated content, with a 40% AI originality score for a rewritten abstract.
  • 🏆 Originality.ai was identified as the best at detecting AI content, even after passing through bypass tools.
  • 🛠 Fasley AI and Undetectable were the most successful in getting around AI detection, with Originality scoring only 2% AI chance for Undetectable.
  • 🚫 The author warns against directly submitting AI-generated content as one's own work due to the potential for odd phrasing and unnatural language.
  • 📈 The effectiveness of AI bypass tools varied, with some failing to fool Originality's detection system, such as Bypass AI, which scored 100% AI.
  • 💡 The author suggests using AI-generated content as a scaffold for one's own understanding and work, rather than for direct submission.
  • 🔑 The video concludes with a recommendation to explore the 12 best AI tools for academics and researchers for legitimate use.

Q & A

  • What was the purpose of the video?

    -The purpose of the video was to test and compare different AI content detection bypass services to see how effectively they can rewrite content to avoid being detected as AI-generated.

  • What was the initial test content used by the presenter?

    -The initial test content was an abstract written by the presenter for their PhD thesis in 2011, which was used to establish a baseline of non-AI generated content.

  • Which service did the presenter find to be the least effective at detecting AI content?

    -The presenter found Turnitin to be the least effective at detecting AI content, as it gave a high percentage of AI originality even for content that was clearly AI-generated.

  • What was the result of using the service 'Fasley AI' on the abstract?

    -After using Fasley AI, the rewritten abstract passed Turnitin and GPT-0 detection with a 3% chance of being AI-generated and 0% by GPT-0, indicating it was successful in bypassing AI detection.

  • How did 'Stealth Writer' perform in the AI detection test?

    -Stealth Writer's output resulted in a 0% chance of being AI-generated by Turnitin and GPT-0, but Originality detected it with a 39% AI originality score, showing it was not entirely successful in bypassing detection.

  • What was the presenter's experience with 'Undetectable' in the past?

    -The presenter mentioned that in their past experience, 'Undetectable' has been one of the best tools for getting around AI content detection.

  • Which service was the most successful in bypassing Originality's AI detection?

    -The service 'Undetectable' was the most successful in bypassing Originality's AI detection, with only a 2% chance of being detected as AI-generated.

  • What was the result of using 'Bypass AI' on the abstract?

    -Using 'Bypass AI' resulted in a 100% AI originality score by Originality, indicating it was not successful in bypassing AI detection.

  • How did 'Hick Bypass' perform in the AI detection tests?

    -Hick Bypass successfully bypassed Turnitin with a 0% chance of being AI-generated, but Originality detected it with a 56% AI originality score, and GPT-0 showed a 0% chance.

  • What is the presenter's recommendation on using these AI bypass tools?

    -The presenter recommends not to simply copy and paste the output from these tools into a submission, but to use them as a scaffold for understanding and building upon with one's own work and paraphrasing.

Outlines

00:00

🤖 AI Detection Bypass Test Results

The speaker discusses testing five different AI detection bypass services using their PhD abstract from 2011 to ensure it was not AI-generated. They found that Turnitin was not effective in detecting AI content, while Originality performed the best. The services tested included Fasley AI, Stealth Writer, and Undetectable, each with varying degrees of success in bypassing AI detection. The speaker also highlights the importance of not simply copying and pasting the AI-generated content but using it as a foundation to build upon with one's own understanding and paraphrasing.

05:01

🔍 Evaluating AI Bypass Tools' Effectiveness

In this paragraph, the speaker continues to evaluate AI bypass tools, specifically focusing on Bypass AI and Hicks Bypass. They express disappointment in Bypass AI's performance, as it failed to fool Originality's AI detection, which flagged a 100% AI chance. On the other hand, Hicks Bypass showed promising results with Turnitin and GPT-0, but Originality still detected a 56% AI chance. The speaker emphasizes the need for caution when using these tools, suggesting that they should be used as a scaffold for understanding and not as a direct submission due to the unnatural phrasing and word choices that can result from AI-generated content.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡AI Content Detection

AI Content Detection refers to the use of artificial intelligence algorithms to identify and flag content that may have been generated by AI rather than written by a human. In the video, the creator discusses various services designed to bypass these detection systems, which are commonly used in academic settings to ensure originality of work. The video's theme revolves around testing these services to see if they can effectively fool AI detectors into thinking AI-generated content is human-written.

💡PhD Abstract

A PhD Abstract is a brief summary of a doctoral dissertation, encapsulating the research question, methodology, and findings. In the context of this video, the creator uses an abstract from their own PhD, written in 2011, as a control to test the AI detection systems. The abstract serves as a baseline to demonstrate that the content was not originally AI-generated.

💡Originality

Originality, in the context of this video, refers to the degree to which content is unique and not copied from other sources or generated by AI. The script mentions 'originality' as a tool that was able to detect AI content to some extent, suggesting it as a reliable indicator of whether the text is original or not.

💡Turnitin

Turnitin is a plagiarism detection service widely used in educational institutions to check the originality of students' work. The video script indicates that Turnitin was not very effective at detecting AI-generated content, raising concerns about its reliability in the context of AI-generated text.

💡AI Bypass Tools

AI Bypass Tools are services or software designed to alter AI-generated content in such a way that it can evade detection by AI content detection systems. The video provides a comparative analysis of several such tools, demonstrating their effectiveness in fooling AI detectors.

💡Fasley AI

Fasley AI is one of the AI bypass tools mentioned in the script. The creator paid for this service to test its effectiveness in altering AI-generated content to pass as human-written. The tool was successful in bypassing AI detection, as indicated by the zero percent AI content score from Turnitin and GPT.

💡Stealth Writer

Stealth Writer is another AI bypass tool discussed in the video. It is used to 'humanize' AI-generated text, making it appear as though it was written by a human. The script shows that Stealth Writer was able to bypass Turnitin and GPT detection but was detected by the Originality tool with a 39% AI score.

💡Undetectable

Undetectable is an AI bypass tool that the creator found to be effective in the past. The video demonstrates that this tool was able to generate content that passed Turnitin and GPT detection with zero AI content score and was only slightly detected by Originality with a 2% AI score.

💡Bypass AI

Bypass AI is an AI bypass tool that the creator had high hopes for, given the investment of a year's subscription. However, the tool did not perform well in the test, as it was detected by Originality with a 100% AI score, indicating that the content was clearly AI-generated.

💡Hick Bypass

Hick Bypass is an AI tool mentioned in the script, which the creator used to test its ability to bypass AI detection systems. The tool was able to fool Turnitin with a 0% AI content score and GPT with a zero score, but Originality detected it with a 56% AI score, showing mixed results.

💡Academic Integrity

Academic Integrity is the concept of maintaining honesty in academic work, which includes originality, proper citation, and avoiding plagiarism. The video indirectly touches on this concept by discussing the use of AI bypass tools, which could potentially undermine academic integrity if used to deceive AI detection systems.

Highlights

The presenter tested five services to bypass AI detection with their PhD abstract written in 2011.

Turnitin was found to be ineffective at detecting AI-generated content, with a 40% AI originality score.

Originality was identified as the best tool for detecting AI content, with a 100% AI detection rate.

Fasley AI was able to bypass AI detection with a 3% chance of being AI-generated according to Turnitin.

Stealth Writer achieved a 39% AI originality score, with Turnitin showing zero AI detection.

Undetectable AI tool performed well, with only a 2% chance of AI generation detected by Originality.

Bypass AI failed to fool Originality, which detected a 100% chance of AI generation.

GP0 AI tool showed zero AI detection, indicating successful bypassing of its detection mechanism.

Hick Bypass demonstrated a 56% AI originality score by Originality, but zero AI detection by Turnitin and GP0.

Turnitin and GP0 were deemed ineffective in detecting AI content, even when provided with AI-generated text.

Originality consistently outperformed other tools in detecting AI-generated content, regardless of bypass attempts.

The presenter suggests using AI bypass tools not for direct submission, but to scaffold understanding and original work.

AI-generated content often contains unnatural word choices and may not be suitable for academic submission.

The presenter emphasizes the importance of building upon AI-generated content with personal understanding and paraphrasing.

The video also discusses the ethical implications of using AI content and the necessity of proper attribution.

A call to action is made for viewers to explore other AI tools for academics and researchers in a linked video.

Casual Browsing

How to Bypass AI Content Detection (Humanize AI with Bypass GPT)

2024-07-13 00:15:00

AI Detection Bypass: How to Write Undetectable AI Content

2024-07-12 22:55:00

New Way to Bypass AI Detection (Guaranteed) ✅

2024-07-11 05:50:00

How to Bypass TurnItIn AI Writing Detection (ChatGPT)

2024-07-11 10:35:00

The EASIEST Way To Remove Background In Affinity Photo

2024-06-11 21:50:00