Complete Adobe Express GPT Tutorial - [Become a ChatGPT Designer in 5 Minutes]
TLDRIn this video, the host reviews Adobe Express's GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) to assess its utility within the Adobe interface. The review compares it to other GPTs, such as Canva's, and finds that Adobe's version is limited to a search directory of pre-existing templates rather than allowing for full design customization within the chat interface. The host attempts to design a logo and a flyer but encounters limitations, such as the inability to add custom text or images directly through the chat. The video concludes that while Adobe's GPT is a step in the right direction, it is currently more of a template search engine than a robust design tool. The host also mentions that Adobe's GPT is free to use, albeit requiring a subscription for full access. The video ends with an invitation to explore more about GPTs through a dedicated playlist.
Takeaways
- 🔍 Adobe Express has released a new feature called 'gbt' in their store, which is being reviewed for its effectiveness and potential to drive traffic to Adobe's site.
- 💰 To access the full functionality of Adobe's 'gbt', users need to pay $20 a month to become a Creative Cloud user, although the 'chat gbt' is currently free.
- 🌟 The reviewer has previously reviewed other 'gbts' such as Canva's, noting limitations in certain contexts.
- 🚀 The goal is to test if Adobe's 'gbt' can create an entire poster within the 'gbt' interface, which would be a powerful feature.
- 📉 Initial tests show that Adobe's 'gbt' does not allow for creating custom text within the 'gbt' interface, which is a limitation.
- 📚 The 'gbt' seems to function more as a search directory for Adobe's existing templates rather than a full design tool within the interface.
- 🔗 When specific design requests are made, the 'gbt' directs users to Adobe's interface for further editing, indicating a reliance on Adobe's software for detailed work.
- 🏈 There's a cultural note where the term 'football' is clarified as 'American football' to avoid confusion with soccer, showing the platform's international reach.
- 🚫 The 'gbt' has limitations in terms of customization and direct design manipulation, which may be due to legal or strategic reasons to drive users to Adobe's website.
- 📈 Users can still use the 'gbt' to quickly find and save templates that match their needs, although with less flexibility than hoped.
- 📝 The reviewer provides a candid assessment, stating that while the 'gbt' is functional, it is limited and not the best they have seen.
Q & A
What is the purpose of the video?
-The purpose of the video is to evaluate whether Adobe's GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) is useful and effective when integrated within the Chat GPT interface, and to see if it can be leveraged to create designs without needing to use Adobe's front-end interface.
What is the cost to access Adobe's GPT functionality?
-To access Adobe's GPT functionality, one would typically need to pay $20 a month to be a Creative Cloud (CC) subscriber. However, at the time of the video, Chat GPT is free for version 3.5.
What limitations were found when attempting to use Adobe's GPT for designing a logo?
-The limitations found include an inability to create custom text within the Chat GPT interface and an inability to add a custom image to the design. The user is instead directed to Adobe's interface for further editing.
How does the user feel about the potential of using Chat GPT for design purposes?
-The user expresses skepticism and finds the current capabilities to be limited, comparing it to their experience with Canva's GPT, which also had limitations in certain contexts.
What is the user's primary use for Adobe software?
-The user primarily uses Adobe software for Photoshop to create thumbnails and other graphic design elements for the software they are developing.
What is the user's opinion on the Adobe Express GPT after testing it?
-The user is not impressed with Adobe Express GPT, stating it is limited and more of a search directory for Adobe's templates rather than a powerful design tool within the Chat GPT interface.
What is the user's suggestion for the future of GPT technology in design?
-The user suggests that for GPT technology to be more powerful in design, it should allow users to create designs directly within the Chat GPT interface with more customization options.
What is the user's recommendation for those interested in GPT technology?
-The user recommends checking out the playlist at the end of the video, which covers everything about GPTs, including creating one's own GPT or exploring other GPTs.
How does the user describe the current state of Adobe's GPT in relation to other GPTs they have reviewed?
-The user describes Adobe's GPT as not the best they have seen, and they are brutally honest about its limitations, emphasizing that it is currently more of a template search engine.
What is the user's final verdict on Adobe's GPT after the review?
-The final verdict is that while Adobe's GPT is functional, it is quite limited and does not live up to the expectations of being a powerful design tool within the Chat GPT interface.
What does the user suggest as a step in the right direction for GPT technology?
-The user suggests that making GPT technology more public and accessible, such as allowing access through an incognito tab without needing a subscription, is a step in the right direction.
What is the user's advice for someone who is confused about why Adobe's GPT is not working as expected?
-The user advises that it's not that Adobe's GPT is not working, but rather it is just limited in its capabilities, which might be due to legal implications or Adobe's incentive to drive traffic to their website.
Outlines
😀 Exploring Adobe's GBT: Utility and Limitations
The video script discusses the release of Adobe's GBT (Generative Bot Technology) and the aim to evaluate its capabilities within the Chad GBT interface. The host expresses skepticism about whether Adobe's GBT can provide significant value beyond driving traffic to their site. The video compares Adobe's GBT to others like Canva's, noting limitations in customization within the chat interface. The host also mentions the need to pay $20 a month for full access but notes that chat GBT 3.5 is currently free. The script details attempts to create a logo and a flyer, highlighting the limitations in adding custom text and images directly through the Chad GBT interface. It concludes that Adobe's GBT seems to function more as a template search directory rather than a comprehensive design tool within the chat interface.
😕 Adobe GBT's Limitations and User Experience
The second paragraph of the script addresses the user's experience with Adobe's GBT, emphasizing its limitations. The host attempts to use the technology for personal purposes but encounters issues that lead to a realization that the GBT's functionality is restricted. The video promises a comprehensive review of Adobe Express GBT, and the host remains candid about its performance. They also provide a link to a playlist that covers various aspects of GBTs, including their creation and evaluation. The script ends with a teaser for the next video, encouraging viewers to stay tuned for more on the topic.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Adobe Express
💡ChatGPT Designer
💡GBT (Generative Bot)
💡Canva GBT
💡Plus User
💡Incorporate Custom Text
💡Adobe Interface
💡Templates
💡Design Limitations
💡International Platform
💡Legal Implications
💡Playlist
Highlights
Adobe Express has released a new GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) in the GPT store.
The video aims to test if Adobe's GPT can be effectively used within Chad GPT's interface.
Adobe's GPT has received mixed reviews with 3K stars and only 10,000 conversations.
To access Adobe's functionality, users need to pay $20 a month as a Creative Cloud user.
Currently, Chat GPT is free, and Adobe has allowed worldwide access through an incognito tab.
The reviewer primarily uses Adobe for Photoshop to create thumbnails and other graphic designs.
The initial test involves designing a logo for a shop to see if custom text can be created within the interface.
The first attempt to customize text within the Chad GPT interface fails, indicating a limitation.
Adding a custom image to the design is also not possible, suggesting a search directory type GPT rather than a full design tool.
The GPT seems to be more of a template search engine rather than a design tool within the chat interface.
The reviewer attempts to create a flyer for a sports podcast, highlighting the need for more details.
The platform requires clarification on the term 'football' to distinguish between American football and soccer.
Users can save the generated design directly from the interface if they like the initial design.
The GPT's limitations are evident when trying to create a Facebook post about a bake sale.
The GPT is limited to being a search engine for Adobe's templates rather than a comprehensive design tool.
The reviewer does not recommend Adobe Express GPT as the best GPT they've seen, citing its limitations.
The video concludes with an invitation to check out a playlist dedicated to GPTs for more information.