AI Art Webtoons are terrible. (I found another one)
TLDRThe video script discusses the reviewer's disappointment with an AI-generated medieval fantasy furry webtoon called 'Wolfbane'. The critique focuses on the inconsistencies in character design, poor paneling, and the misuse of AI art, arguing that only skilled artists should utilize AI art programs to enhance their work, not beginners or those lacking artistic talent.
Takeaways
- 🎨 The reviewer expresses strong dissatisfaction with an AI art webtoon called 'Wolfbane', criticizing its low quality and poor reception.
- 👎 The webtoon is described as having inconsistent character designs and a lack of coherent storytelling, with the narrative being non-existent and jumbled.
- 🐺 The story revolves around a group of anthropomorphic wolves in a medieval fantasy setting, fighting necromantic creatures, but fails to engage the audience.
- 😡 The reviewer is frustrated by the misuse of AI art in the webtoon, feeling that it devalues the hard work and skill of human artists.
- 🚫 The opinion is expressed that only 'real' artists should use AI art tools, as they can utilize them to improve and optimize their work, rather than creating subpar content.
- 🖌️ The reviewer contrasts 'Wolfbane' with other webtoons like 'Africa', where the artist's growth and improvement are evident over time.
- 🤯 The inconsistency in the AI-generated art is highlighted, with characters and backgrounds changing drastically from panel to panel.
- 📚 The reviewer's personal project, a medieval fantasy furry comic, is mentioned as an example of a more authentic and earnest effort compared to the AI-generated webtoon.
- 💭 The script discusses the potential benefits of AI art for professional artists, such as saving time and aiding in the creation process for weekly updates.
- 🎭 The reviewer's disappointment with the webtoon is emphasized, as they believe it sets a bad precedent for the use of AI in art and storytelling.
Q & A
What is the main issue the speaker has with AI Art Webtoons?
-The speaker finds AI Art Webtoons to be of poor quality, with inconsistent character designs and a lack of coherent storytelling.
How does the speaker describe the character design in the webtoon 'Wolfbane'?
-The speaker describes the character design as constantly changing, with generic features and Middle School fanfiction-tier names.
What is the speaker's criticism about the art style of the webtoon?
-The speaker criticizes the art style for being inconsistent and distracting, with the character's appearance changing from panel to panel.
What issue does the speaker have with the paneling of the webtoon?
-The speaker feels that the webtoon is not properly paneled, as it seems like random images generated by AI prompts are just put together without creating a cohesive narrative.
How does the speaker view the use of AI art in webtoons?
-The speaker initially believed that AI art could be a useful tool for beginners, but after reviewing 'Wolfbane', they feel that only real artists should use AI art programs to improve their work and optimize their workflow.
What is the speaker's opinion on the use of AI art by professional artists?
-The speaker believes that professional artists can make productive and creative use of AI art programs, as it can help them with time-consuming tasks and improve their workflow.
What does the speaker suggest is the main problem with AI-generated art in storytelling?
-The speaker suggests that the main problem is the lack of consistency and the inability of AI to create a cohesive and engaging narrative.
How does the speaker describe the background art in 'Wolfbane'?
-The speaker describes the background art as having a constantly changing color composition, which adds to the jarring and inconsistent feel of the webtoon.
What example does the speaker provide to contrast with 'Wolfbane'?
-The speaker provides the example of a webtoon called 'Africa', where the creator is visibly improving their art skills over time, unlike 'Wolfbane'.
What is the speaker's final verdict on AI Art Webtoons like 'Wolfbane'?
-The speaker's final verdict is that AI Art Webtoons like 'Wolfbane' are fundamentally flawed and lack any redeeming qualities.
How does the speaker feel about their own work in comparison to 'Wolfbane'?
-Although the speaker acknowledges that their own work may look inferior by default, they feel proud because they are genuinely creating it themselves, unlike the creator of 'Wolfbane'.
Outlines
🎨 Critique of AI-Generated Medieval Fantasy Comic
The speaker begins by discussing their experience reviewing AI-generated content, specifically a medieval fantasy furry webcomic called 'Wolfbane'. They express their disappointment with the low quality of the artwork and storytelling, highlighting the inconsistencies in character design and the lack of a cohesive narrative. The speaker criticizes the overuse of AI prompts, which result in a jarring and disjointed visual experience. They argue that AI art should be a tool for beginners to learn the foundations of art, but 'Wolfbane' fails to demonstrate this potential. The speaker also mentions their own work on a similar comic, emphasizing the importance of actual drawing and artistic effort over AI-generated images.
🚫 The Misuse of AI Art and Its Impact on Creativity
In this paragraph, the speaker further discusses their stance on the use of AI art in comic creation. They argue that only real artists should be allowed to use AI art programs, as they are the ones who can make productive and creative use of this medium. The speaker contrasts the misuse of AI art by inexperienced individuals, which results in low-quality and nonsensical content, with the beneficial use of AI by professional artists to optimize their workflow and overcome time-consuming challenges. They provide an example of a webcomic called 'Blood Ry', where AI is used effectively to assist artists with difficult tasks. The speaker concludes by reiterating their belief that AI art should be a tool to enhance, not replace, human creativity.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡AI Art
💡Webtoon
💡Character Design
💡Inconsistency
💡Paneling
💡Speech Bubbles
💡Backgrounds
💡Storytelling
💡Artistic Skill
💡AI Art Programs
Highlights
The reviewer expresses dissatisfaction with AI art webtoons, specifically targeting 'Wolfbane' for its low quality.
The reviewer's fans play a role in finding webtoons for review, showcasing a community engagement aspect.
A previous AI art webtoon was reviewed by the duo, with a link provided for viewers interested in that review.
The initial optimism about AI art being a helpful tool for beginners is challenged by the reviewer's experience with 'Wolfbane'.
Inconsistency in character design is highlighted as a major issue with the AI-generated webtoon.
The webtoon's narrative is described as non-existent and a mess, indicating a lack of storytelling structure.
The reviewer criticizes the use of AI art for its inability to produce a cohesive and consistent visual style.
The speech bubbles' design and placement are noted as problematic, hindering readability.
Backgrounds are criticized for their lack of consistency, affecting the overall visual experience.
The reviewer compares the learning curve of traditional comic artists with the lack of improvement seen in AI-generated works.
A specific example of a comic called 'Africa' is provided to illustrate the improvement over time in traditional comic creation.
The use of AI art in another webtoon 'Blood Ry' is cited as an example of its effective use by professional artists.
The reviewer argues that only real artists should use AI art programs, emphasizing the importance of skill and intention.
The potential of AI art to assist overworked comic artists is acknowledged, recognizing its benefits in optimizing workflow.
The reviewer shares a personal project of creating a medieval fantasy furry comic, demonstrating a hands-on approach to art creation.
The video concludes with a call to support the reviewer's Patreon, highlighting the community and financial aspects of content creation.